Hi Dave,
the relations file allows to add tags from the relations to the members.
I guess you want to do something else, maybe calculate a polygon
that encloses all members ?
Gerd
Dave Swarthout wrote
Can someone give me information about rendering relations. I have tagged
some relations of
Yes, ideally I'd like to show the contents of the name tag (for example,
name=Nice Apartments), in the center of the space occupied by the three (or
more) objects that make up the site.
Is this possible?
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 6:08 PM, GerdP gpetermann_muenc...@hotmail.com
wrote:
Hi Dave,
On 02/23/2015 01:06 PM, Andrzej Popowski wrote:
There is no need to add overview to gmapsupp. It can be copied as a
separate file to GPS with the same result.
Is this possible on gps units which support only one map file? What
should be the name of the overview map file?
Hi Gerd,
I see no reason why we should not add the overview map
to the gmapsupp if that is what the user wants
and the device is working fine with it.
There is no need to add overview to gmapsupp. It can be copied as a
separate file to GPS with the same result. Or user can merge overview
map
I'ld rather see a good OSM based worldmap (or simply based on other open
sources if they prove to be better for use ) that we could use to exchange
the basemap.
Thinking about a map - usable both in Basecamp/Mapsource as well as on GPS
Devices - 15-20MB in size - including ocean/land, big cities
Hi Dave,
it is not possible now, but I think the needed calculation is not very
complicated.
We'd need a tag like mkgmap:calcPolygon=1 to tell mkgmap that it
should add a way containing the tags of the relation and the points
of the convex hull.
I'm busy with the housenumbers2 branch now, maybe
Hi Ralf,
Is this possible on gps units which support only one map file?
It is possible on all current outdoor GPS and nuvis but probably not on
eTrex Legend HCx. You would have to merge img. It can be done with
mkgmap or GMapTool.
--
Best regards,
Andrzej
Hi Steve,
I think Arndt is right, mkgmap requires much more heap now when computing
the index, also without the new --x-split-name-index option.
This is his error message:
Exception in thread main java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: GC overhead limit
exceeded
at
Hi Thorsten,
yes, please upload the file. Maybe it is related to tile boundaries.
We have no special code in splitter to make sure that house numbers
are complete.
Gerd
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 08:53:27 +0100
From: ku...@suse.de
To: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev]
Hi,
On 02/23/2015 08:57 AM, Gerd Petermann wrote:
My understanding so far:
If you disable the basemap or if you don't like the basemap
in the device you should either add the overview map to the
gmapsupp file or use low resolution levels for each tile.
yes, both ways work on my eTrex Legend
On Mon, Feb 23, Gerd Petermann wrote:
Hi Thorsten,
yes, please upload the file. Maybe it is related to tile boundaries.
We have no special code in splitter to make sure that house numbers
are complete.
http://osm.thkukuk.de/tmp/71300045.osm.pbf
The options I did use (stripped down):
Hi Thorsten,
ok, can reproduce the problem now. Looking for the reason...
Gerd
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 10:13:59 +0100
From: ku...@suse.de
To: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] SEVERE log messages from housenumber2 r3471
On Mon, Feb 23, Gerd Petermann wrote:
Hi
Can someone give me information about rendering relations. I have tagged
some relations of type=site but they don't show up in my maps. One such
site is a named group of three apartment buildings. The relation itself has
a name tag and each building is merely tagged as building=yes. I've had
Hi,
sorry, answering my own post again.
I think I found a simple improvement, see attached patch.
I've committed it with r3477 in the housenumber2 branch.
Gerd
From: gpetermann_muenc...@hotmail.com
To: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 22:53:55 +0100
Subject: Re:
14 matches
Mail list logo
