Re: [mkgmap-dev] Fw: Help

2015-05-03 Thread Thorsten Kukuk
On Mon, May 04, Gerd Petermann wrote: > Hi Thorsten, > > thanks for the feedback. What do you think about my proposed > solution? I like the idea. But I'm currently still thinking, if this really works. For something like "place=city", the place tag and the name are the most important thing mos

Re: [mkgmap-dev] Fw: Help

2015-05-03 Thread Gerd Petermann
Hi Thorsten, thanks for the feedback. What do you think about my proposed solution? Gerd > Date: Mon, 4 May 2015 07:48:21 +0200 > From: ku...@suse.de > To: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk > Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Fw: Help > > > Hi, > > On Mon, May 04, Gerd Petermann wrote: > > > I am not

Re: [mkgmap-dev] Fw: Help

2015-05-03 Thread Thorsten Kukuk
Hi, On Mon, May 04, Gerd Petermann wrote: > I am not sure if the OSM data is okay, but I think we probably have > more sure cases. Did anybody try to solve that already? > Do you see a general rule which might be implemented > as filter before or after style processing? The OSM data is okay,

Re: [mkgmap-dev] Fw: Help

2015-05-03 Thread Gerd Petermann
Hi all, I got some screenshots from Anor.Carlos that show this relation: http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/333659 which has name=Barra do Garças and place=town. If I got that right, the --add-pois-to-area option creates a node with the tag place=town for it, although the relation also has a

Re: [mkgmap-dev] Fw: Help

2015-05-03 Thread thundercel
Hi Gerd. thanks for your quick response and congratulations to the whole team for the excellent work developed. Yes, it's POI generated by the add-as-to-area option and only when the boundary relationship. For the other areas we are not having problem. It is a filter we need and we do not know

Re: [mkgmap-dev] RFC: naming unnamed roads

2015-05-03 Thread Marko Mäkelä
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 09:57:04AM -0400, Greg Troxel wrote: The general assumption would seem to be that the street names attached to house addresses belong to roads that are reachable by car, or that each residence is reachable by car. Maybe in some rare case there is some access restriction

Re: [mkgmap-dev] Fw: Help

2015-05-03 Thread GerdP
Hi Marcio, okay, so this is about the POI generated by the add-pois-to-area option and other OSM nodes with similar tags and the problem is that you cannot know if both exist or only one? Well, I think there is no trick to solve that problem, but it should be easy to implement a filter. Something

[mkgmap-dev] Fw: Help

2015-05-03 Thread thundercel
Hi Gerd, Trying to help the Anor.Carlos, is there any command to be entered by the user in rendering to be removed key: place inserted boundary: relation? Unfortunately in Brazil some editors inserted a KEY place in boundary-administrative relationship there so duplicity in indexing as the key:

Re: [mkgmap-dev] Help

2015-05-03 Thread GerdP
Hi A.Carlos, I am sorry, I don't yet understand your problem. Maybe you can post some screenshots to describe what you want and what you get? You can use http://files.mkgmap.org.uk/ for that. Gerd A. Carlos wrote > help > > Hello, the question may seem amateurish, but I'm having problems >

Re: [mkgmap-dev] Add man_made=mast to the default style

2015-05-03 Thread GerdP
Hi Ben, thanks for the patch, is committed with 3554. Gerd Ben Konrath wrote > Hi, > > Here's a small improvement to the tower entry of the default style. > man_made=mast is a valid OSM tag and it is used a bit so I think we should > include it. > > https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/man_m

[mkgmap-dev] Commit: r3554: Add man_made=mast to the default style

2015-05-03 Thread svn commit
Version mkgmap-r3554 was committed by gerd on Sun, 03 May 2015 Add man_made=mast to the default style - Ben Konrath ___ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev

[mkgmap-dev] Help

2015-05-03 Thread A. Carlos
help Hello, the question may seem amateurish, but I'm having problems compiling my maps. Seeing the OSM, the region that use in many places are using the place at the midpoint of the Administrative Liminte and also in relation to limit the administrative, in the case here level 8. Howeve