Re: [mkgmap-dev] housenumber2 branch r3589

2015-05-19 Thread Bernd Weigelt
Hi Gerd Sorry for the late answer, i'm have to spent some time for my job ;-) You're right, there's really no inc/access, it looks like an error, but i can find every address on a polygon, that i have searched for, tested with my O650 On the other side, there are only six messages, 'houses not

[mkgmap-dev] question reg. exits

2015-05-19 Thread Gerd Petermann
Hi all, I just noticed that mkgmap treats POI with 0x2000 = type 0x2800 special. It looks for the tags exit:to=* and exit:facility=* to add extra information to the POI. This info is shown when you click on an exit in Basecamp, it shows the fields Name, Description, and Overnight Parking.

Re: [mkgmap-dev] housenumber2 branch r3589

2015-05-19 Thread Bernd Weigelt
Hi Gerd you're right, it should be inc/address. After adding this to inc/polygons i didn't get any error messages for DACH. IMHO you can merge housenumbers2 to trunk Bernd Am Dienstag, 19. Mai 2015, 10:21:12 schrieb Gerd Petermann: Hi Bernd, thanks for testing. Just to make sure: it's

Re: [mkgmap-dev] housenumber2 branch r3589

2015-05-19 Thread Gerd Petermann
Hi Bernd, thanks for testing. Just to make sure: it's inc/address I was looking for, not inc/access. The effect of the missing include is that mkgmap:city etc. are not filled for the (house) polygon. In that case the value from the road is taken, so you will only see a problem when you search

Re: [mkgmap-dev] question reg. exits

2015-05-19 Thread Thorsten Kukuk
Hi, On Tue, May 19, Gerd Petermann wrote: Hi all, I just noticed that mkgmap treats POI with 0x2000 = type 0x2800 special. It looks for the tags exit:to=* and exit:facility=* to add extra information to the POI. This info is shown when you click on an exit in Basecamp, it shows

Re: [mkgmap-dev] [Patch v1] improve handling of exits

2015-05-19 Thread Gerd Petermann
Hi Dave, the patch changes the rules in the default style so that exist on primary roads are taken into account. More important for your test case: It also changes the code so that exists on motorway_links to other motorway_links are taken into account. The old code only looked at exits on

Re: [mkgmap-dev] [Patch v1] improve handling of exits

2015-05-19 Thread Dave Swarthout
When you say you didn't change the echotags code, did you rewrite the style rule? If you did that I'm embarrassed to admit I am unable to see the difference. AFAIK I'm using the exact same style file for both runs, but the run with the older executables produced no output. I replaced that jar

Re: [mkgmap-dev] levels in style aren't processed correctly

2015-05-19 Thread steve.sgalowski
The only prob I have with the codes is saying below 17 is to small to split but not saying this on all maos though Stephen  Original message From: Andrzej Popowski po...@poczta.onet.pl Date:20/05/2015 8:45 AM (GMT+10:00) To: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk Subject: Re:

Re: [mkgmap-dev] levels in style aren't processed correctly

2015-05-19 Thread Andrzej Popowski
Hi Steve, I don't understand this. If you have no --levels option then the default should be used, which has a maximum of 4. Looks like there is no defaults now, or maybe only level 0 gets a default resolution. What do you think that the message text should be? Maybe something like

Re: [mkgmap-dev] levels in style aren't processed correctly

2015-05-19 Thread Steve Ratcliffe
Hi Andrzej If I put no level= or no overview-level= in command line option nor in style I get following error: Error in style: Error: Level number too large, max=1 Could not open style Number of ExitExceptions: 1 I don't understand this. If you have no --levels option then the default

Re: [mkgmap-dev] [Patch v1] improve handling of exits

2015-05-19 Thread GerdP
Hi Dave, I am not sure if you understand that echotags always worked. The problem is/was that the rule was not executed because the expression evaluated to false. In other words, I did not change the echotags code, I changed the code so that it is more likely that the term mkgmap:exit_hint=true