Re: [mkgmap-dev] missing link

2018-01-24 Thread Steve Ratcliffe
On 24/01/18 22:20, Steve Ratcliffe wrote: On 24/01/18 21:49, Gerd Petermann wrote: now I get a 502 (Bad gateway) forhttp://files.mkgmap.org.uk/ All should be normal again. Steve ___ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk

[mkgmap-dev] Minor corrections in LocatorConfig

2018-01-24 Thread Carlos Dávila
Attached is a patch that fixes a couple of issues regarding "both drive-on-left and drive-on-right" wrong warnings. Index: resources/LocatorConfig.xml === --- resources/LocatorConfig.xml (revisión: 4086) +++

Re: [mkgmap-dev] missing link

2018-01-24 Thread Steve Ratcliffe
On 24/01/18 21:49, Gerd Petermann wrote: now I get a 502 (Bad gateway) forhttp://files.mkgmap.org.uk/ Thanks, working on it... ..Steve ___ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev

Re: [mkgmap-dev] missing link

2018-01-24 Thread Gerd Petermann
Hi Steve, now I get a 502 (Bad gateway) for http://files.mkgmap.org.uk/ Gerd Von: mkgmap-dev im Auftrag von Steve Ratcliffe Gesendet: Mittwoch, 24. Januar 2018 22:35 An:

Re: [mkgmap-dev] missing link

2018-01-24 Thread Steve Ratcliffe
Hi Nick Just to say that clicking on 'mkgmap' gives me a 404 : http://files.mkgmap.org.uk/ Thanks, now fixed. ..Steve ___ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev

[mkgmap-dev] missing link

2018-01-24 Thread nwillink
@Steve Hi Steve Just to say that clicking on 'mkgmap' gives me a 404 : http://files.mkgmap.org.uk/ r Nick -- Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Mkgmap-Development-f5324443.html ___ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk

Re: [mkgmap-dev] DEM: performance with bicubic interpolation

2018-01-24 Thread osm@pinns
Hi Gerd Perhaps I'm too fussy  differating between values per se  and string values Anyway,  the --dem-interpolation seems a very good idea with a chance to add  more types of interpolation  when available. Nick On 24/01/2018 15:57, Gerd Petermann wrote: Hi Nick, is that so? I'll change

Re: [mkgmap-dev] DEM: performance with bicubic interpolation

2018-01-24 Thread Gerd Petermann
Hi Nick, is that so? I'll change it to --dem-interpolation=auto|bicubic|bilinear Gerd Von: mkgmap-dev im Auftrag von osm@pinns Gesendet: Mittwoch, 24. Januar 2018 16:52 An:

Re: [mkgmap-dev] DEM: performance with bicubic interpolation

2018-01-24 Thread osm@pinns
Hi Gerd I'm a bit confused when you mentioned value as that seems to imply a number? Just to clarify : the options are: --dem-interpolation=auto or bilateral or bicubic ? Nick On 24/01/2018 15:10, Gerd Petermann wrote: Hi all, I like Andrzejs suggestion and created a patch that

Re: [mkgmap-dev] DEM: performance with bicubic interpolation

2018-01-24 Thread Gerd Petermann
Hi all, I like Andrzejs suggestion and created a patch that implements and documents the option like this: --dem-interpolation=value Use this option to speciy the method that is used to interpolate data from hgt raster to the DEM raster. The value bicubic gives the

Re: [mkgmap-dev] documentation patch

2018-01-24 Thread Gerd Petermann
Hi Steve, thanks for the clarification. I've committed the patch to trunk now. Gerd Von: mkgmap-dev im Auftrag von Steve Ratcliffe Gesendet: Mittwoch, 24. Januar 2018 13:17 An:

Re: [mkgmap-dev] DEM: performance with bicubic interpolation

2018-01-24 Thread Gerd Petermann
Hi Andrzej, yes, your original patch dem-align-6.patch implements bicubic-catmull and the faster replacement by Paul Breeuwsma does that as well. Gerd Von: mkgmap-dev im Auftrag von Andrzej Popowski

Re: [mkgmap-dev] DEM: performance with bicubic interpolation

2018-01-24 Thread Andrzej Popowski
Hi, I have added more algorithms for testing, patch is attached. Patched mkgmap recognize following values for x-dem-interpolation: bilinear bicubic bicubic-spline bicubic-catmull bicubic-hermite I have prepared new set for testing: http://files.mkgmap.org.uk/download/408/interpolation2.7z

Re: [mkgmap-dev] documentation patch

2018-01-24 Thread Steve Ratcliffe
Hi Just a note - I think the term mapset comes from Garmin but as far as I can tell they always spell it as two words "map set". For example in Mapsource (early versions at least) they use the term "Map Set Name". Also see https://buy.garmin.com/en-GB/GB/p/506564 which uses the term "map

Re: [mkgmap-dev] bug in r-4025

2018-01-24 Thread lig fietser
Thanks Gerd for sorting this out! Van: mkgmap-dev namens Gerd Petermann Verzonden: woensdag 24 januari 2018 03:10:15 Aan: Development list for mkgmap Onderwerp: Re: [mkgmap-dev] bug in

Re: [mkgmap-dev] documentation patch

2018-01-24 Thread Mike Baggaley
Hi Gerd, I have realised that the 3 other mapset mentions I saw were on the OSM wiki version of the mkgmap documentation, not mkgmap's own, so presumably an out of date copy. Mkgmap's documentation has one other mention in my copy, but this has already been removed by the DEM changes on the live

Re: [mkgmap-dev] bug in r-4025

2018-01-24 Thread Gerd Petermann
Hi Minko, the blocksize problem was the reason for the change in http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/websvn/revision.php?repname=mkgmap=4054 and the new branch auto-block I think this problem is solved. Gerd Von: mkgmap-dev

Re: [mkgmap-dev] documentation patch

2018-01-24 Thread Mike Baggaley
Hi Gerd, I don't understand what is meant by a mapset in this context. As I understand it, a single run of mkgmap builds a map, not a set of maps. The map may consist of a number of files - is that what you mean by mapset? I notice there are three other mentions of mapset in the page, but no

Re: [mkgmap-dev] bug in r-4025

2018-01-24 Thread lig fietser
Hi Gerd, I have found out that the levels in the option file matters: These settings are fine if I skip level 23: levels = 0:24, 1:22, 2:20, 3:18 overview-levels = 4:17, 5:15, 6:14 These go wrong, the gmap file is not compiled: levels = 0:24, 1:23, 2:22, 3:20, 4:18 overview-levels = 5:17,

Re: [mkgmap-dev] bug in r-4025

2018-01-24 Thread Gerd Petermann
Hi Minko, cannot reproduce the error with these options: java -jar mkgmap-r4025.jar --x-dem=f:\srtm3 --x-dem-dists=3312,6628,9942,13248,44176 --x-overview-dem-dist=88368 --gmapi 49000245.o5m Maybe I have different hgt files, maybe it depends on other options. If you can reproduce it with this

Re: [mkgmap-dev] bug in r-4025

2018-01-24 Thread lig fietser
BTW, If i change it into x-dem-dists: 9942,9942,9942,13248,44176 the rendering is just fine. Van: mkgmap-dev namens lig fietser Verzonden: woensdag 24 januari 2018 01:14:28 Aan: mkgmap-dev

Re: [mkgmap-dev] bug in r-4025

2018-01-24 Thread lig fietser
Hi Gerd I used these options: x-dem: G:\mkgmap\DEM x-dem-dists: 3312,6628,9942,13248,44176 x-overview-dem-dist=88368 The strange thing is that the img is compiled without errors but not rendered. This issue/bug is not happening in r-4066 so I guess it is "solved" but you never know.

Re: [mkgmap-dev] bug in r-4025

2018-01-24 Thread Gerd Petermann
Hi Minko, Hard to say without detailed information about the used dem options. Errors in the dem encoder potentially cause buffer overflows/underruns in Garmin software. Maybe you can post the options used with r4025? Gerd Von: mkgmap-dev

[mkgmap-dev] bug in r-4025

2018-01-24 Thread lig fietser
Hi Gerd, Users of my Openfietsmap Germany reported a bug in my maps, one tile was missing. Normally something went wrong with splitting (tiles too big) but this one was compiled fine as img. However, it didn't render, only the overview map. I have compiled it with r-4025. When I compile it