Hi Carlos,
I've added a test to avoid this exception.
@Mike: Not sure what goes wrong here. I think when you feed mkgmap with *.img
there is nothing that can
be done with more than one job.
Gerd
Von: mkgmap-dev im Auftrag von Carlos
Dávila
Gesendet:
Version mkgmap-r4125 was committed by gerd on Mon, 19 Feb 2018
avoid division by zero
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/websvn/revision.php?repname=mkgmap&rev=4125
___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listin
El 19/02/18 a las 14:53, svn commit escribió:
Version mkgmap-r4124 was committed by gerd on Mon, 19 Feb 2018
slightly modified maxjobs-v6.patch by Mike Baggaley
-- if max-jobs option is not set, try to find a reasonable value
-- further improve documentation of options
-- report run time in hou
Hi all,
Frank Stinner found more about the meaning of the byte in DEM header at offset
0x12 of the zoom level header.
This value gives a shrink factor that is used to minimize the deltas.
All height delta values are divided by this factor, so that e.g. with a factor
of 5 the values
12,19,20,10 b
Hi all,
I have no idea how to solve the problem with crashes in MapSource when
--route is used with --transparent and --dem . Maybe there is another flag that
has to be changed, maybe it is not supported by Garmin.
So, the best work around seems to be using transparent background polygons
(0x4b)
Version mkgmap-r4124 was committed by gerd on Mon, 19 Feb 2018
slightly modified maxjobs-v6.patch by Mike Baggaley
-- if max-jobs option is not set, try to find a reasonable value
-- further improve documentation of options
-- report run time in hours, minutes and seconds instead of ms
http://ww
Hi Gerd,
I would prefer removing the static modifier as you suggest, but accessing
the variable via mm.maxJobs rather than mm.getMaxJobs(), and having no
getter implementation. However, I am happy with using the getter if you
prefer it.
I think getters and setters in mkgmap have been overused. I
Hi
I think it is important to indicate if a signed or unsigned is being
written so that the range can be asserted:
eg:
public void putU1(int val) {
assert val >= 0 && val <= 255 : val;
buf.put((byte)val);
}
and
public void putS1(int val) {
Hi Mike,
sorry for the late response.
I've just recognized the static modifier in maxjobs. I think it is better to
use a getter instead, see
attached modifed version of the patch. If you agree, I'll commit this version.
Gerd
Von: mkgmap-dev im Auftrag v
