Ticker Berkin writes:
(I'm a long-term mkgamp user, sometimes contributor, mostly lurking
lately.)
> I don't think having:
>
> BRANCH: default-typ
>
> makes sense because I don't think there will ever be a single, ideal
> file. So better to accept now that it will be a collection of files,
>
Hi Gerd
I don't think having:
BRANCH: default-typ
makes sense because I don't think there will ever be a single, ideal
file. So better to accept now that it will be a collection of files,
and, as nothing exists at the moment, they might as well go in 'trunk'.
In trunk, they will be visible
Hi Ticker,
well, we have it because I wrote that I'd like to have a typ file for the
default style. My problem is that I cannot help with that because
I feel helpless when it comes to questions reg. "what looks better?" or "what
should be rendered and how?"
Do you think we need another branch
Hi Gerd
Is it worth having a branch for typ-files development?
Ticker
On Tue, 2018-11-27 at 09:25 +, Gerd Petermann wrote:
> Hi Ticker,
>
> okay, see
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/websvn/revision.php?repname=mkgmap=4258
>
> Gerd
>
>
> Von:
Hi Ticker,
okay, see http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/websvn/revision.php?repname=mkgmap=4258
Gerd
Von: mkgmap-dev im Auftrag von Ticker
Berkin
Gesendet: Dienstag, 27. November 2018 09:56
An: Development list for mkgmap
Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] New branch
Hi Gerd
Happy with either, but slightly prefer typ-files.
I don't think it's worth me doing another patch, it was really just a 1
line change to build.xml and inserting the attached file
Ticker
On Tue, 2018-11-27 at 06:27 +, Gerd Petermann wrote:
> Hi Ticker,
>
> I don't like the
