Hi Ticker,
I think it would be better to measure the sum of road lengths instead of the
number of nodes.
In some areas you may have unconnected roads with many km length, e.g. in
Canada or Australia.
Gerd
Von: mkgmap-dev im Auftrag von Gerd
Petermann
Hi Ticker,
okay, I am working on the part that removes those islands from NOD. I am
developing it with the NET-no-NOD branch.
With trunk you get higher counts as each end of an unconnected way is also a
routing node.
Gerd
Von: mkgmap-dev im Auftrag von
Hi Gerd
That runs OK.
As before, I get lots of 2 node roads - often bridges over streams in
open land, and quite a few (about 1/10 the number of the 2 noders) are
3 and 4 nodes - frequently paths between buildings in schools /
campuses and short bits of path at either end of the bridges in open
l
Hi Ticker,
here is the patch without recursive call.
Gerd
Von: mkgmap-dev im Auftrag von Gerd
Petermann
Gesendet: Freitag, 18. Oktober 2019 12:46
An: Development list for mkgmap
Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Please test branch NET-no-NOD
Hi Ticker,
thank
Hi Ticker,
thanks for testing. I'll work on a patch without recursive calls.
Gerd
Von: mkgmap-dev im Auftrag von Ticker
Berkin
Gesendet: Freitag, 18. Oktober 2019 12:41
An: Development list for mkgmap
Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Please test branch NET-no
Hi Gerd
I've applied the patch to my 'current' version and tried running it but
it gives:
java.lang.StackOverflowError
at
uk.me.parabola.imgfmt.app.net.RouteNode.visitNet(RouteNode.java:938)
at
uk.me.parabola.imgfmt.app.net.RouteNode.visitNet(RouteNode.java:941)
... 1020 lines l
Hi Ticker,
please check: attached is a simple patch that implements the calculation of
routing islands.
It just reports islands with less than 5 routing nodes and the position of one
of the nodes.
It ignores such islands which have at least one node that is a boundary node.
Remember that we also
