okay, that might be the problem. In potlatch I could not discover this.
It's a common mistake. I had some problems myself with these multiple copies of
ways. This could help:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Stammtisch_Hannover_Tipps#Doppelte_Wege_finden
(German)
Hi Clinton,
I think, streets and pedestrian squares need to be linked to allow routing. If
there is no link, we should assume that this is intended as there is no
connection reality. The more OSM related routings systems are being used, the
more people will see to edit their data more
Interesting experiments, thank you!
Maybe, we should add these results to the Wiki?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mkgmap/routing
Is there any chance to get influence on these penalty values? I.e., is there a
penalty factor included in gmapsupp.img file which can be adjusted?
OK, this would
Mark, thanks a lot !!
Unfortunately, I have to postpone own tests as I do not have a development
software available at work.
Is this patch going to be integrated into Jar snapshot? Will it be available in
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/snapshots/mkgmap-latest.tar.gz tomorrow?
The map generated with
Thanks to you all for the ideas!
Now I see that a lot can be achieved by editing the style file. A lot good
things, and a lot nonsense as well. ;-)
The default style adds a foot=yes for cycleways, which should not be assumed
as a default permission, imho. But I'm not sure about this.
Bicycle
Just a few thoughts...
1. Why not giving a special mark to such nodes which have been generated by a
clipping process? Maybe there is own tag for this? Then you would know that
merging is not appropriate.
2. And... please be careful when merging nodes which are parts of ways with
different
