Re: [mkgmap-dev] [PATCH v2] - Do not write unnecessary POI information

2010-04-18 Thread Thilo Hannemann
Am 18.04.2010 um 19:15 schrieb Felix Hartmann: > On 18.04.2010 10:46, Thilo Hannemann wrote: >> I'm not sure about the ID range 0x64xx to 0x66xx - has anybody tested this >> and knows whether there are additional IDs that won't have their information >> shown? >> >> Regards >> Thilo > Actually

Re: [mkgmap-dev] [PATCH v2] - Do not write unnecessary POI information

2010-04-18 Thread Felix Hartmann
On 18.04.2010 20:42, Thilo Hannemann wrote: Am 18.04.2010 um 19:15 schrieb Felix Hartmann: On 18.04.2010 10:46, Thilo Hannemann wrote: I'm not sure about the ID range 0x64xx to 0x66xx - has anybody tested this and knows whether there are additional IDs that won't have their inform

Re: [mkgmap-dev] [PATCH v2] - Do not write unnecessary POI information

2010-04-18 Thread Thilo Hannemann
When looking at the code I'm not so sure anymore that this patch does what I expect it to do. So please do *not* include it into trunk. I'll think about it and will come up with another one. Regards Thilo ___ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.m

Re: [mkgmap-dev] [PATCH v2] - Do not write unnecessary POI information

2010-04-18 Thread Daniela Duerbeck
Felix Hartmann wrote: > Your addition dit it, and removed the fix_my_adress, however now there > appears the "name" instead or the name of the POI type from the > typfile. Is this just the standard behaviour, or is now the name > really included? > > I'm kinda wondering, cause the whole patch on