v4
forgot to make the POI a routing node - it is now - this stops routing
across the POI when the start and end points are within the restricted
area.
-
v3
now adds extra points either side of the POI to reduce length of
way that has restricted access. Currently points are 25m away
> v4
>
> forgot to make the POI a routing node - it is now - this stops routing
> across the POI when the start and end points are within the restricted
> area.
Sorry, my comment is incorrect. It only stops routing across the POI
when the start point is in the restricted area not when both the st
Howdy folks,
Shall I commit this stuff or does it need more work?
To recap, it stops routing across a bollard (or other POI that has
access restrictions). It works OK except in the case where the start and
end positions are close to the bollard. As previously discussed, that
is probably not fixa
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 10:32 PM, Mark Burton wrote:
> Shall I commit this stuff or does it need more work?
I have not yet had time to test this, but would it be an idea to
optionally enable or disable this behaviour? I know that mkgmap is
slowly growing an unmanageable number of command line opt
Hi Clinton,
> I have not yet had time to test this, but would it be an idea to
> optionally enable or disable this behaviour? I know that mkgmap is
> slowly growing an unmanageable number of command line options, but
> this still might help if we discover unwanted side effects.
I can do that. My
Clinton Gladstone schrieb:
> In particular, I wonder how this would affect special cycling maps
> which use (or abuse) automobile routing for bicycles.
This shouldn't be a problem, since the bollard implementation is based
on the access values. And such a map has to deal with the access tags in
ge
2009/7/20 Torsten Leistikow
> Clinton Gladstone schrieb:
> > In particular, I wonder how this would affect special cycling maps
> > which use (or abuse) automobile routing for bicycles.
>
> This shouldn't be a problem, since the bollard implementation is based
> on the access values. And such a m
Felix Hartmann schrieb:
> Well but one allways has to remap these values to motorcar=yes for
> special purpose maps, as only car/motorcycle provides proper routing.
Yes, but you have to do such a change for all highway types anyway
(bicycle=* -> motorcar=*, motorcar=* -> bicycle=*). So there is no
Hi Felix,
> Well but one allways has to remap these values to motorcar=yes for special
> purpose maps, as only car/motorcycle provides proper routing.
Never understood that need to route as a car, but I am happy to cater
for such a foible.
> I have not
> really read through the patch as it does
2009/7/20 Mark Burton
>
> Hi Felix,
>
> > Well but one allways has to remap these values to motorcar=yes for
> special
> > purpose maps, as only car/motorcycle provides proper routing.
>
> Never understood that need to route as a car, but I am happy to cater
> for such a foible.
>
bicycle does r
10 matches
Mail list logo
