gt;
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 22. Oktober 2015 21:30
An: Development list for mkgmap
Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] [patch v1] don't route the highway=construction ways
Hi Gerd,
Thanks for the explanation (again) and for the new patch. This approach is
probably better considering the concerns about v1. Per
k <
> mkgmap-dev-boun...@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von Ben Konrath <
> b...@bagu.org>
> *Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 21. Oktober 2015 09:28
> *An:* Development list for mkgmap
> *Betreff:* Re: [mkgmap-dev] [patch v1] don't route the
> highway=construction ways
>
>
<mkgmap-dev-boun...@lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto:mkgmap-dev-boun...@lists.mkgmap.org.uk>>
im Auftrag von chris66 <chris66...@gmx.de<mailto:chris66...@gmx.de>>
Gesendet: Dienstag, 20. Oktober 2015 10:52
An: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto:mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk>
Bet
gmx.de>
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 20. Oktober 2015 10:52
> An: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] [patch v1] don't route the highway=construction
> ways
>
> Am 16.10.2015 um 20:46 schrieb Alexandre Loss:
> > I agree also that "mkgmap:ignore-for-
p-dev-boun...@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
<mkgmap-dev-boun...@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von Ben Konrath
<b...@bagu.org>
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 21. Oktober 2015 09:28
An: Development list for mkgmap
Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] [patch v1] don't route the highway=construction ways
For people who h
Am 16.10.2015 um 20:46 schrieb Alexandre Loss:
> I agree also that "mkgmap:ignore-for-routing=yes" is more clear.
I used this tag already in OSM to mark isolated ways. :-)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/111674198#map=18/54.3354/8.5915
Chris
___
v] [patch v1] don't route the highway=construction ways
Hi Gerd,
> The patch implements a way to have a line
> with a routable type that appears in NET but not in NOD.
> In other words, the NET file doesn't contain a pointer into NOD.
I only express concern, that it could break rout
2
An: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] [patch v1] don't route the highway=construction
ways
Am 16.10.2015 um 20:46 schrieb Alexandre Loss:
> I agree also that "mkgmap:ignore-for-routing=yes" is more clear.
I used this tag already in OSM to mark
Hi,
I guess Garmin img format allows for many non-standard solutions, but I
would be afraid to implement them into standard compilation. It could
lead to unexpected problems, difficult to trace. My last experience with
using routable lines as no-routable objects for addressing is following:
l>
Gesendet: Montag, 19. Oktober 2015 13:37
An: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] [patch v1] don't route the highway=construction ways
Hi,
I guess Garmin img format allows for many non-standard solutions, but I
would be afraid to implement them into standard comp
Hi Gerd,
> I am not sure what you did and what "routing doesn't work" means
> in this case.
My map was similar to the experiments, that you have analyzed here:
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/2015q2/023244.html
Only I have added relatively small number of non-routable lines with
v] [patch v1] don't route the highway=construction ways
Hi Gerd,
> I am not sure what you did and what "routing doesn't work" means
> in this case.
My map was similar to the experiments, that you have analyzed here:
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/2015q2/02
Hi Gerd,
> The patch implements a way to have a line
> with a routable type that appears in NET but not in NOD.
> In other words, the NET file doesn't contain a pointer into NOD.
I only express concern, that it could break routing, because it looks
like a quite non-standard approach.
--
Best
...@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
<mkgmap-dev-boun...@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von Mike Baggaley
<m...@tvage.co.uk>
Gesendet: Freitag, 16. Oktober 2015 21:12
An: 'Development list for mkgmap'
Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] [patch v1] don't route the highway=construction ways
How about mkgmap:
ap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 12:02:23 +0200
> Subject: [mkgmap-dev] [patch v1] don't route the highway=construction ways
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> attached patch implements the new internal tag
> mkgmap:add-to-NOD=false
> to handle the issue discussed here:
&g
16. Oktober 2015 19:52
An: Development list for mkgmap
Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] [patch v1] don't route the highway=construction ways
Hi Gerd,
Thanks for creating this patch. I ran a build with the patch and everything
seemed work fine. I installed the map into BaseCamp without proble
=yes
> is better.
>
>
> Gerd
>
>
> --
> *Von:* mkgmap-dev-boun...@lists.mkgmap.org.uk <
> mkgmap-dev-boun...@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von Ben Konrath <
> b...@bagu.org>
> *Gesendet:* Freitag, 16. Oktober 2015 19:52
> *An:* Development list for mkgmap
> *Be
gt; im Auftrag von Ben Konrath
<b...@bagu.org <mailto:b...@bagu.org> >
Gesendet: Freitag, 16. Oktober 2015 19:52
An: Development list for mkgmap
Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] [patch v1] don't route the highway=construction ways
Hi Gerd,
Thanks for creating this patch. I ran a build with the p
2015 12:02:23 +0200
Subject: [mkgmap-dev] [patch v1] don't route the highway=construction ways
Hi all,
attached patch implements the new internal tag
mkgmap:add-to-NOD=false
to handle the issue discussed here:
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/don-t-route-through-highway-construction-tt5856734
Hi all,
attached patch implements the new internal tag
mkgmap:add-to-NOD=false
to handle the issue discussed here:
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/don-t-route-through-highway-construction-tt5856734.html
It shows how to use it in the default style.
I've also added a rule to ignore
20 matches
Mail list logo
