Hi,
I wasn't able to find specific addresses on my Garmin 62s, even
if I did know that I entered them in OSM.
During testing of my adjusted style for the new mkgmap version,
I found out that the addresses are not missing, but that the addresses
don't have a city assigned. That's why I cannot fin
Hi Thorsten,
I wasn't able to find specific addresses on my Garmin 62s, even
if I did know that I entered them in OSM.
does that mean that address search works normally but not for these
cases ?
Gerd
___
mkg
Hi Gerd,
On Fri, Dec 27, Gerd Petermann wrote:
> Hi Thorsten,
>
>
> I wasn't able to find specific addresses on my Garmin 62s, even
> if I did know that I entered them in OSM.
>
> does that mean that address search works normally but not for these
> cases ?
The address search works fine ex
Hi Thorsten,
it seems that the LocationHook doesn't work in r2912, at least
not with an old boundary file created 2012.
Looking at it...
Gerd
> Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2013 10:25:17 +0100
> From: ku...@suse.de
> To: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Add
Hook doesn't work in r2912, at least
not with an old boundary file created 2012.
Looking at it...
Gerd
> Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2013 10:25:17 +0100
> From: ku...@suse.de
> To: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Address search: city sometimes missing
>
y a few numbers.
Gerd
> Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2013 11:42:42 +0100
> From: wmgc...@web.de
> To: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Address search: city sometimes missing
>
> Hi Gerd,
>
> the LocationHook seems to work correct.
> Thorsten wrote:
Hi
For example, look here:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/49.44674/11.03418
There are two buildings from Siemens, Von-der-Tann-Strasse 30 and 31
in 90439 Nuernberg. As you could see in the attached screenshot,
only the housenumber 31 has a city assigned, the number 30 has not.
I downl
On Mon, Dec 30, Steve Ratcliffe wrote:
>
> Hi
>
>
>> For example, look here:
>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/49.44674/11.03418
>>
>> There are two buildings from Siemens, Von-der-Tann-Strasse 30 and 31
>> in 90439 Nuernberg. As you could see in the attached screenshot,
>> only the housenum
Hi
I tried it with "Mittelfranken" from
http://download.geofabrik.de/europe/germany/bayern.html
OK thanks. I tried with that file with the same result; the city is
on both buildings.
I've uploaded the relevant tile http://files.mkgmap.org.uk/detail/165
for others to try in case it is environ
On Thu, Jan 02, Steve Ratcliffe wrote:
> Hi
>
>> I tried it with "Mittelfranken" from
>> http://download.geofabrik.de/europe/germany/bayern.html
>
> OK thanks. I tried with that file with the same result; the city is
> on both buildings.
>
> I've uploaded the relevant tile http://files.mkgmap.org
Jan 2014 15:07:21 +0100
> From: ku...@suse.de
> To: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Address search: city sometimes missing
>
> On Thu, Jan 02, Steve Ratcliffe wrote:
>
> > Hi
> >
> >> I tried it with "Mittelfranken" f
On 03/01/14 14:07, Thorsten Kukuk wrote:
I used the prebuild mkgmap.jars from mkgmap.org, so that shouldn't be that
problem.
Ahh, but I don't so it might be ;)
Just reproduced your problem with a clean build of 2931. Will look into
it a little later.
..Steve
Hi
It appears to be the housenumber block count patch.
I've posted a previous version, and I've attached the most
up-to-date version of it.
This is good, since previously I had no proof that it did anything
useful (cgpsmapper maps do not seem to set it).
There is an unresolved issue, in that it
Hi Steve,
regarding routing on level 0: We allow now to use resolution 23 or lower as the
lowest
level, but routing is still only done on level 0.
Gerd
Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2014 16:31:00 +
From: st...@parabola.me.uk
To: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Address search
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 03, Steve Ratcliffe wrote:
> Hi
>
> It appears to be the housenumber block count patch.
> I've posted a previous version, and I've attached the most
> up-to-date version of it.
Thanks, with that patch it is much better, but I still see
streets where some housenumbers does not ha
On 04/01/14 08:42, Thorsten Kukuk wrote:
Thanks, with that patch it is much better, but I still see
streets where some housenumbers does not have a city assigned.
For example Von-der-Tann-Strasse in Hammelburg and Ingolstadt.
Some housenumbers have the city assigned, others not.
Thanks for the
Hi Thorsten
Thanks, with that patch it is much better, but I still see
streets where some housenumbers does not have a city assigned.
For example Von-der-Tann-Strasse in Hammelburg and Ingolstadt.
Some housenumbers have the city assigned, others not.
I found a bug where the wrong nodes were be
Hi
Any comments on this patch? I shall commit it soon if I hear nothing,
since it seems to be a big improvement in my own tests.
On 05/01/14 22:19, Steve Ratcliffe wrote:
Hi Thorsten
Thanks, with that patch it is much better, but I still see
streets where some housenumbers does not have a c
On Fri, Jan 17, Steve Ratcliffe wrote:
> Hi
>
> Any comments on this patch? I shall commit it soon if I hear nothing, since
> it seems to be a big improvement in my own tests.
Sorry, I misunderstood you and thought the patch was already submitted.
I have it applied now and will test it, too.
19 matches
Mail list logo
