On Sun, 25 Sep 2011 12:31:07 +0100, Steve Ratcliffe wrote:
>> Could please someone look into the splitter code and check if the
>> corrections that were done to osmosis have to by applied to the
>> splitter, too?
>
>OK the reported problem should be fixed now.
Thank you, Steve. It's working fine
Hi
> Could please someone look into the splitter code and check if the
> corrections that were done to osmosis have to by applied to the
> splitter, too?
OK the reported problem should be fixed now.
The test file you sent still does not lead to any output files since it
is too small.
..Steve
_
Hi Michael
> Could please someone look into the splitter code and check if the
> corrections that were done to osmosis have to by applied to the
> splitter, too?
Thanks for the very detailed report! I shall fix it if I can.
..Steve
___
mkgmap-dev mail
On Tue, 20 Sep 2011 22:14:36 +0200, Michael Prinzing wrote:
>On Mon, 19 Sep 2011 17:53:03 +0200, Michael Prinzing wrote:
>
>>there seems to be a problem with the latest splitter and data in pbf
>>format if it was created with osmosis 0.39.
>
>After some further testing, it now looks like a problem
On Mon, 19 Sep 2011 17:53:03 +0200, Michael Prinzing wrote:
>there seems to be a problem with the latest splitter and data in pbf
>format if it was created with osmosis 0.39.
After some further testing, it now looks like a problem with osmosis
only. If I am converting the pbf data created with os
El 19/09/11 23:16, Michael Prinzing escribió:
> On Mon, 19 Sep 2011 20:03:20 +0200, Thorsten Kukuk wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Sep 19, Michael Prinzing wrote:
>>
>>> there seems to be a problem with the latest splitter and data in pbf
>>> format if it was created with osmosis 0.39.
>>>
>>> When I am conver
On Mon, Sep 19, Michael Prinzing wrote:
> I am running the binary distribution of osmosis under Windows XP with
> Java 1.7. This should not be the problem since it is working with
> osmosis 0.38, but anyway: what was the environment in which you've
> tested successfully, and did you compile the so
On Mon, 19 Sep 2011 20:03:20 +0200, Thorsten Kukuk wrote:
>On Mon, Sep 19, Michael Prinzing wrote:
>
>> there seems to be a problem with the latest splitter and data in pbf
>> format if it was created with osmosis 0.39.
>>
>> When I am converting a xml file to pbf by callig osmosis 0.39 just with
> Exact map coverage is (0.0,0.0) to
> (2.1457672119140625E-5,2.1457672119140625E-5)
This bounding box is a whopping 5.7m² in size (in projected map units)
and lies at the intersection of zeroth meridian and equator. I suspect
there is very little data in that region... hence, osmosis is not
f
On Mon, Sep 19, Michael Prinzing wrote:
> Hello,
>
> there seems to be a problem with the latest splitter and data in pbf
> format if it was created with osmosis 0.39.
>
> When I am converting a xml file to pbf by callig osmosis 0.39 just with
> --read-xml and --write pbf parameters, the splitte
Hello,
there seems to be a problem with the latest splitter and data in pbf
format if it was created with osmosis 0.39.
When I am converting a xml file to pbf by callig osmosis 0.39 just with
--read-xml and --write pbf parameters, the splitter (called without
parameters) says:
--
11 matches
Mail list logo