maskedMinAngle = 0x30;
>> +}
>>
>> Does that help?
>>
>> Gerd
>> ____
>> Von:
>> mkgmap-dev-bounces@.org
>>
>> mkgmap-dev-bounces@.org
>> im Auftrag von Minko
Hi Gerd,
I have tested it a bit and noticed some improvements in routing at sharp
corners.
Haven't seen any major differences or issues yet, i think it's a good
improvement.
___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
gt; im Auftrag von Minko
<ligfiet...@online.nl>
Gesendet: Samstag, 17. Oktober 2015 15:17
An: Development list for mkgmap
Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] feedback on sharp-angles-v4.patch?
I have tested it with --cycle-map
What is the difference vs without this option?
...@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
<mkgmap-dev-boun...@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von Minko
<ligfiet...@online.nl>
Gesendet: Samstag, 17. Oktober 2015 16:04
An: Development list for mkgmap
Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] feedback on sharp-angles-v4.patch?
Hi Gerd,
My highest road_speed value is 3.
Maybe
online.nl>
Gesendet: Samstag, 17. Oktober 2015 10:55
An: Development list for mkgmap
Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] feedback on sharp-angles-v4.patch?
Hi Gerd,
I have tested it a bit and noticed some improvements in routing at sharp
corners.
Haven't seen any major differences or issues yet, i think
I have tested it with --cycle-map
What is the difference vs without this option?
___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
Hi Gerd,
My highest road_speed value is 3.
Maybe this is why this option doesn't make very little difference, if any at
all?
> Hi Minko,
>
> if you can't find any, that is also telling me that the option is rather
> useless.
>
> With --cycle-map mkgmap might produce larger changes when the
>
Hi all,
I am still waiting for feedback from Felix, but maybe other are willing to
contribute?
See http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Patch-v4-sharp-angles-tp5854127.html
Gerd
___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
Hi Gerd
I've tried to run it but cycle-map is not a valid option?
___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
Hi
you can upload http://files.mkgmap.org.uk/download/282/mkgmap.jar again. I
can´t find the file.
I've made the original file re-appear.
..Steve
___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
Hi Gerd,
well the problem is that I only test on long distances. So my opinion -
v4 and not giving --cycle-map is what I found best.
As for the differences between v2-v3-v4, it's so small in the end result
that I really cannot objectively classify one or the other as better.
Overall it's
Sorry my fault, I have used the wrong/older mkgmap jar file, now it is
running...
> Hi Gerd
> I've tried to run it but cycle-map is not a valid option?
___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
Hi Gerd,
you can upload http://files.mkgmap.org.uk/download/282/mkgmap.jar again. I
can´t find the file.
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/feedback-on-sharp-angles-v4-patch-tp5856851p5856860.html
Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at
13 matches
Mail list logo
