Hi Bernd
Once you start looking you see all sorts of mapping errors - I've been
finding a lot of roads mapped as long closed ways. What seems like a
common fix to this is to create a correctly joined and tagged linear
way and leave the area untouched.
I don't understand what you mean by creating
Hi
I have made a test in the region nearby and got lots of ways with area=yes
changed your rule a little bit ;-)
... & area=yes {echo '${highway}'}
Most of this ways didn't have a virtual way between each node across the area,
so they are possibly lost for routing and create lot of islands, wh
o:dd...@gmx.de]
Sent: 13 September 2020 10:09
To: Development list for mkgmap ; Ticker Berkin
Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] highway=unclassified & area=yes
Hi Ticker
just for me a hint, how can i ignore this in a style ?
Am 13.09.2020 um 09:59 schrieb Ticker Berkin:
> Hi all
>
> Checking
Well, if these areas are legitimate OSM objects, that's one thing. But if
they're some mapper's idea of a way to customize the map for his or her (or
a company's) particular use then I think they should be removed. Especially
if they're causing routing problems.
What are they? What purpose do they
I've found quite a few proper roads mapped as closed ways with
[highway=unclassified, area=yes], but in the cases I've looked at so
far, there has also been a correct unclosed way to represent the road.
I can't think of any method using style rules to detect the case when
there isn't this addition
ThanksMit freundlichem Gruß Manfred Haiduk
Ursprüngliche Nachricht
Von: Ticker Berkin
Datum: 13.09.2020 11:48 (GMT+01:00)
An: Development list for mkgmap
Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] highway=unclassified & area=yes
HiIn styles / default / lines, around line 181,
Hi
In styles / default / lines, around line 181, the change would be:
highway=unclassified [0x06 road_class=0 road_speed=3 resolution 21]
to:
highway=unclassified & area!=yes [0x06 road_class=0 road_speed=3
resolution 21]
If you style has a mop-up for unhandled highways, make sure that this
is
On 12/09/2020 18:02, Gerd Petermann wrote:
Yes, look like mapping errors (mapping for the renderer?). Maybe area:highway=*
was meant. I would not change the style for them.
I'm not local to these examples but they're clearly mapping for the
renderer. Looking at
https://www.openstreetmap.org
Hi Ticker
just for me a hint, how can i ignore this in a style ?
Am 13.09.2020 um 09:59 schrieb Ticker Berkin:
Hi all
Checking the GBR, I detect 1865 of these highway areas. They are done
in a consistent and systematic way by a number of mappers.
I don't think it is a mapping error or an atte
Hi all
Checking the GBR, I detect 1865 of these highway areas. They are done
in a consistent and systematic way by a number of mappers.
I don't think it is a mapping error or an attempt to define the extent
of a junction as per the proposed tagging highway=junction.
Rather it is some option on th
Von: mkgmap-dev im Auftrag von
> ael
> Gesendet: Samstag, 12. September 2020 18:52
> An: Development list for mkgmap
> Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] highway=unclassified & area=yes
>
> On Sat, Sep 12, 2020 at 05:27:03PM +0100, Ticker Berkin wrote:
> > Hi all
> >
>
Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] highway=unclassified & area=yes
On Sat, Sep 12, 2020 at 05:27:03PM +0100, Ticker Berkin wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Diagnosing what seemed like superfluous navigation pop-up, eg "Turn
> left on A1", while driving on the A1, I discover quite a few junctions
&g
On Sat, Sep 12, 2020 at 05:27:03PM +0100, Ticker Berkin wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Diagnosing what seemed like superfluous navigation pop-up, eg "Turn
> left on A1", while driving on the A1, I discover quite a few junctions
> are surrounded by a closed way with tags [highway=unclassified,
> area=yes]
>
Hi all
Diagnosing what seemed like superfluous navigation pop-up, eg "Turn
left on A1", while driving on the A1, I discover quite a few junctions
are surrounded by a closed way with tags [highway=unclassified,
area=yes]
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/239371846
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way
14 matches
Mail list logo
