Hello Felix,
Is there a reason for not committing the patch? It is working great for
me and also Steve found it good
It has some good aspects but it also (as I think Steve mentioned) has
the downside of causing the sea polygon to be preserved so everything
ends up sea colour. As the
Hi Felix,
Yip, that patch works great. (using only this patch, without the earlier
patch; if I add earlier patch too I loose the relations again)
Yes, it replaces the earlier patch.
Good.
I am tempted to commit this - does anyone think that preserving the
original ways is a bad idea? If
Have a look here, wherever the boundaries use the same way as the ways,
the ways get dropped, even if not rendering the boundaries at all
(removing any reference to boundary from the style-file).
Is this maybe a geofabrik error, or some error in mkgmap multipolygon
handling? I have noticed
Festive greetings Felix,
Have a look here, wherever the boundaries use the same way as the ways,
the ways get dropped, even if not rendering the boundaries at all
(removing any reference to boundary from the style-file).
Is this maybe a geofabrik error, or some error in mkgmap
On 27.12.2009 22:33, Mark Burton wrote:
Festive greetings Felix,
Have a look here, wherever the boundaries use the same way as the ways,
the ways get dropped, even if not rendering the boundaries at all
(removing any reference to boundary from the style-file).
Is this maybe a
Felix,
Thanks for that patch... It does remove the bug, but all relations seem
to get dropped by using this patch too. So not an ideal solution -:)
BTW before using this patch, relations like cycleroutes would even show
up when all ways were dropped due to multipolygon outer...
OK - try
On 28.12.2009 00:04, Mark Burton wrote:
Felix,
Thanks for that patch... It does remove the bug, but all relations seem
to get dropped by using this patch too. So not an ideal solution -:)
BTW before using this patch, relations like cycleroutes would even show
up when all ways were
