On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 10:04 AM, Dan Dennedy wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 1:19 AM, j-b-m wrote:
>> On Sunday 04 November 2012 11:52:36 Dan Dennedy wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 11:03 AM, Dan Dennedy wrote:
>>> > On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:40 AM, j-b-m
>> wrote:
>>> > > On Monday 05 Marc
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 1:19 AM, j-b-m wrote:
> On Sunday 04 November 2012 11:52:36 Dan Dennedy wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 11:03 AM, Dan Dennedy wrote:
>> > On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:40 AM, j-b-m
> wrote:
>> > > On Monday 05 March 2012 22:52:01 Dan Dennedy wrote:
>> > >> On Sun, Feb 12, 2
On Sunday 04 November 2012 11:52:36 Dan Dennedy wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 11:03 AM, Dan Dennedy wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:40 AM, j-b-m
wrote:
> > > On Monday 05 March 2012 22:52:01 Dan Dennedy wrote:
> > >> On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 1:12 AM, j-b-m
wrote:
> > >> > On Saturday 1
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 11:03 AM, Dan Dennedy wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:40 AM, j-b-m wrote:
> > On Monday 05 March 2012 22:52:01 Dan Dennedy wrote:
> >> On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 1:12 AM, j-b-m wrote:
> >> > On Saturday 11 February 2012 23:09:25 Dan Dennedy wrote:
> >> >> On Tue, Feb 7
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:40 AM, j-b-m wrote:
> On Monday 05 March 2012 22:52:01 Dan Dennedy wrote:
>> On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 1:12 AM, j-b-m wrote:
>> > On Saturday 11 February 2012 23:09:25 Dan Dennedy wrote:
>> >> On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Dan Dennedy wrote:
>> >> > On Tue, Feb 7, 2012
On Monday 05 March 2012 22:52:01 Dan Dennedy wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 1:12 AM, j-b-m wrote:
> > On Saturday 11 February 2012 23:09:25 Dan Dennedy wrote:
> >> On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Dan Dennedy wrote:
> >> > On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 2:06 PM, j-b-m
wrote:
> >> >> On Tuesday 07 Febr
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 1:12 AM, j-b-m wrote:
> On Saturday 11 February 2012 23:09:25 Dan Dennedy wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Dan Dennedy wrote:
>> > On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 2:06 PM, j-b-m wrote:
>> >> On Tuesday 07 February 2012 10:32:24 Dan Dennedy wrote:
>> >>> On Tue, Feb 7, 201
On Saturday 11 February 2012 23:09:25 Dan Dennedy wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Dan Dennedy wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 2:06 PM, j-b-m wrote:
> >> On Tuesday 07 February 2012 10:32:24 Dan Dennedy wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 10:08 AM, j-b-m
wrote:
> >>> > Hello.
> >>> >
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Dan Dennedy wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 2:06 PM, j-b-m wrote:
>> On Tuesday 07 February 2012 10:32:24 Dan Dennedy wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 10:08 AM, j-b-m wrote:
>>> > Hello.
>>> >
>>> > Trying to improve image sequence support in Kdenlive, I discover
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 2:06 PM, j-b-m wrote:
> On Tuesday 07 February 2012 10:32:24 Dan Dennedy wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 10:08 AM, j-b-m wrote:
>> > Hello.
>> >
>> > Trying to improve image sequence support in Kdenlive, I discovered that
>> > MLT
>> > cannot currently load a sequence with
On Tuesday 07 February 2012 10:32:24 Dan Dennedy wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 10:08 AM, j-b-m wrote:
> > Hello.
> >
> > Trying to improve image sequence support in Kdenlive, I discovered that
> > MLT
> > cannot currently load a sequence with files like this:
(...)
> We could simply increase
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 10:08 AM, j-b-m wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Trying to improve image sequence support in Kdenlive, I discovered that MLT
> cannot currently load a sequence with files like this:
>
>
> image205.jpg
> image206.jpg
> image207.jpg
> (...)
>
> If we pass "image%.3d.jpg" as resource, MLT w
Hello.
Trying to improve image sequence support in Kdenlive, I discovered that MLT
cannot currently load a sequence with files like this:
image205.jpg
image206.jpg
image207.jpg
(...)
If we pass "image%.3d.jpg" as resource, MLT will look for:
image001.jpg, image002.jpg, etc until a max of 100
13 matches
Mail list logo