John Rose wrote:
> On Apr 24, 2008, at 1:23 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
>> John Rose wrote:
>>> This is to fix the build bug observed by Selvan and Charlie.
>>> It is a second-order patch (patch on a patch repository). Apply it
>>> in davinci/patches/hotspot/.
>>> May I have a reviewer, plea
John Rose wrote:
> So, I'll count your build success as a review. (Unless you have more
> review comments? :-)
I realized I had run without testable, so I re-ran to confirm...build
looks fine.
- Charlie
___
mlvm-dev mailing list
[email protected]
On Apr 24, 2008, at 2:26 AM, Rémi Forax wrote:
> In my opinion, getResource() is not the only method that makes this
> assumption
The getResource method probably needs to be adjusted since anonymous
classes have names that are intentionally distorted. The anonymous
class name ends with "/${h
On Apr 24, 2008, at 4:43 AM, Rémi Forax wrote:
> I answer to myself, it's only in the case the host-class is null,
> otherwise the classloader used is the one of the host-class.
Right. The new class is supposed to inherit the same access rights,
protection domain, class loader, from the host c
Charles Oliver Nutter a écrit :
> Rémi Forax wrote:
>> Yesterday evening, I've tried to replace the application classloader
>> (the one used to load the application) by one that use an anymous
>> class loader
>> to load the class. And i've tested by launching SwingSet2.
>>
>> And it doesn't work b
Hey guys,
I've been lurking this list for a while and I got a few questions about the
callcc design.
>From reading the patches when yielding from a contituation the pertinent
stack frames are copied. Have you
considered allocating the continuation stack separately and switching to it
on callcc? G
John Rose a écrit :
> On Apr 24, 2008, at 1:23 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
>> John Rose wrote:
>>> This is to fix the build bug observed by Selvan and Charlie.
>>> It is a second-order patch (patch on a patch repository). Apply it
>>> in davinci/patches/hotspot/.
>>> May I have a reviewer, p
Changeset: db693384cccb
Author:jrose
Date: 2008-04-24 14:31 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/mlvm/mlvm/hotspot/rev/db693384cccb
callcc, anonk: anonk will not build unless callcc is pushed also
Summary: move wkk tweak from callcc to anonk (pending wkk fix is bug 6652736)
Review
Changeset: 916d22cb98a6
Author:jrose
Date: 2008-04-24 14:33 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/mlvm/mlvm/rev/916d22cb98a6
adjust and clarify build instructions
Reviewed-by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
! README.txt
___
mlvm-dev mailing list
mlvm
Charles Oliver Nutter a écrit :
> John Rose wrote:
>
>> This is to fix the build bug observed by Selvan and Charlie.
>>
>> It is a second-order patch (patch on a patch repository). Apply it in
>> davinci/patches/hotspot/.
>>
>> May I have a reviewer, please?
>>
>
> I was able to build, bu
On Apr 24, 2008, at 1:23 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
> John Rose wrote:
>> This is to fix the build bug observed by Selvan and Charlie.
>> It is a second-order patch (patch on a patch repository). Apply
>> it in davinci/patches/hotspot/.
>> May I have a reviewer, please?
>
> Checking it out
Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
> I was able to build, but I can't seem to load
> java.dyn.AnonymousClassLoader in any code I'm running. That could be
> unrelated, perhaps some step I missed?
Doesn't seem like java.dyn is getting stuffed into the build output for me:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/jdk7/jdk7/
John Rose wrote:
> This is to fix the build bug observed by Selvan and Charlie.
>
> It is a second-order patch (patch on a patch repository). Apply it in
> davinci/patches/hotspot/.
>
> May I have a reviewer, please?
I was able to build, but I can't seem to load
java.dyn.AnonymousClassLoader
John Rose wrote:
> For this one, too, may I have a reviewer? Thanks. -- John
>
> P.S. Reviews can include suggestions for improvement!
Looks good to me, and now includes the two key commands I had to hunt
for: qpop and qpush.
No suggestions for improvement at the moment, because I know exact
John Rose wrote:
> This is to fix the build bug observed by Selvan and Charlie.
>
> It is a second-order patch (patch on a patch repository). Apply it in
> davinci/patches/hotspot/.
>
> May I have a reviewer, please?
Checking it out now. Should this be built with or without testable (i.e.
are
For this one, too, may I have a reviewer? Thanks. -- John
P.S. Reviews can include suggestions for improvement!
readme.patch
Description: Binary data
___
mlvm-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo
This is to fix the build bug observed by Selvan and Charlie.
It is a second-order patch (patch on a patch repository). Apply it
in davinci/patches/hotspot/.
May I have a reviewer, please?
-- John
wkk-tweak.dpatch
Description: Binary data
___
ml
On Apr 24, 2008, at 11:29 AM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
I know resources are a problem, but is there any thought going towards
improving switch performance? I know at least one JRuby team member
that
could provide some pretty unpleasant benchmark results that show the
pain we're facing.
T
[cc-ing mlvm-dev in reply, because of general interest]
On Apr 24, 2008, at 5:06 AM, Thamaraiselvan Poomalai wrote:
Hello John,
I have successfully compiled hotsopt and jdk with mlvm patches from
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/mlvm/mlvm.
Thanks for giving it a spin, Selvan.
1) Though i did f
I'm a little fuzzy on the status/level of optimization HotSpot
performance based on switch profiling. John Rose's wiki page on HotSpot
optimizations claims that switches are profiled, but that the
information isn't used very well. And on JRuby and JOni projects, we
have seen that large switches
Lukas Stadler wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'm working on this for 1 1/2 months now (under Johns supervision). I've
> implemented the deserialization part and I'm currently finishing an
> alternative representation of the serialized stack that is more
> accessible from the Java side. This should soon be fi
Hi!
I'm working on this for 1 1/2 months now (under Johns supervision). I've
implemented the deserialization part and I'm currently finishing an
alternative representation of the serialized stack that is more
accessible from the Java side. This should soon be finished and I'll
hopefully be abl
MenTaLguY wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 10:52:42 -0500, Charles Oliver Nutter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> - What's the performance like for copy/restore? I ask because I'm
>> curious if it would be possible to implement a cooperative threading
>> environment with the stack copying capabilities
Charles Oliver Nutter a écrit :
> While I'm waiting, hopefully, for someone to hold my hg-inexperienced
> hand, I was wondering about the status of copyStack/restoreStack at
> present. A few questions off the top of my head:
>
> - What's the correct way to use Unsafe to test this out? All I can f
On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 10:52:42 -0500, Charles Oliver Nutter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> - What's the performance like for copy/restore? I ask because I'm
> curious if it would be possible to implement a cooperative threading
> environment with the stack copying capabilities as they exist today.
I
While I'm waiting, hopefully, for someone to hold my hg-inexperienced
hand, I was wondering about the status of copyStack/restoreStack at
present. A few questions off the top of my head:
- What's the correct way to use Unsafe to test this out? All I can find
online are the nasty reflection hack
Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
> Seems like I'm missing something, or otherwise not patching correctly:
After a clean and rebuild, errors come out slightly differently:
/home/headius/jdk7/jdk7/hotspot/src/share/vm/classfile/classFileParser.cpp:
In member function ‘constantPoolHandle
ClassFilePars
Seems like I'm missing something, or otherwise not patching correctly:
g++ -DLINUX -D_GNU_SOURCE -DIA32 -DPRODUCT -I. -I../generated/adfiles
-I../generated/jvmtifiles
-I/home/headius/jdk7/jdk7/hotspot/src/share/vm/asm
-I/home/headius/jdk7/jdk7/hotspot/src/share/vm/c1
-I/home/headius/jdk7/jdk7/
>> I am not requesting new opcodes but just relaxing the array type contraint
>> of the already existing xALOAD & xASTORE when the VM run a Cobol or C class.
> It really amounts to the same complexity as a new opcode, since every
> tool or JVM phase that looks at opcodes may need to know the ne
Rémi Forax wrote:
> Yesterday evening, I've tried to replace the application classloader
> (the one used to load the application) by one that use an anymous class
> loader
> to load the class. And i've tested by launching SwingSet2.
>
> And it doesn't work because UI program like SwingSet looku
John Rose wrote:
> On Apr 15, 2008, at 8:17 AM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
>>
>> I'm also interested in what we can do to help languages on pre-JDK7
>>
>> JVMs, since the vast majority of real users of JRuby (for example) could
>>
>> use some real help now. But I will look at your patches and t
Ok, finally got around to getting OpenJDK + MLVM patches up and
building. Today I'm planning to look at:
- JRuby using anonymous classloading
Ideally this will just be a matter of swapping in a different
classloader, but then would come the removal of a lot of hassle we
currently have to keep
Rémi Forax a écrit :
> Yesterday evening, I've tried to replace the application classloader
> (the one used to load the application) by one that use an anymous class
> loader
> to load the class. And i've tested by launching SwingSet2.
>
> And it doesn't work because UI program like SwingSet loo
Yesterday evening, I've tried to replace the application classloader
(the one used to load the application) by one that use an anymous class
loader
to load the class. And i've tested by launching SwingSet2.
And it doesn't work because UI program like SwingSet lookup their
resources
like image,
34 matches
Mail list logo
