Changeset: 5306e31b9e04
Author:jrose
Date: 2009-11-23 23:59 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/mlvm/mlvm/hotspot/rev/5306e31b9e04
dynopt: split out inline tuning and disassembler stuff from dynopt
+ disassembler.patch
! dynopt.patch
+ inlines.patch
! series
Changeset: ddecd67aa17b
Author:jrose
Date: 2009-11-23 20:03 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/mlvm/mlvm/hotspot/rev/ddecd67aa17b
indy: fix return type mismatches for inlined MHs
! indy.compiler.inline.patch
___
mlvm-dev mailing list
Changeset: 3a72fb17f74f
Author:jrose
Date: 2009-11-22 16:09 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/mlvm/mlvm/jdk/rev/3a72fb17f74f
meth, indy: Rebase to jdk7-b76 (plus recent bsd-port tweaks)
! indy-6858164.patch
! indy.patch
! indy.tests.patch
! regtest-6891770.patch
! series
Chang
Hi!
Rémi Forax wrote:
> Hi all, Hi Lukas,
> I've sucessfully used continuation with non blocking IO, this is
> really cool.
> see
> http://weblogs.java.net/blog/forax/archive/2009/11/22/nio-server-continuation-java
>
I'm very happy to hear that, thanks for putting this on your blog!
> But @Continu
Hi all, Hi Lukas,
I've sucessfully used continuation with non blocking IO, this is really
cool.
see
http://weblogs.java.net/blog/forax/archive/2009/11/22/nio-server-continuation-java
But @Continuable seems odd for me.
Why method need to be marked @Continuable ?
What is the reason ?
Is there a p
