And I'm almost exclusively interested in coro :)
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 9:03 AM, Lukas Stadler wrote:
> Yes, the coro patch should be applied without continuations.
> It doesn't need any of the continuation functionality - maybe I should
> make that more clear in the series file...
> - Lukas
>
>
Yes, the coro patch should be applied without continuations.
It doesn't need any of the continuation functionality - maybe I should
make that more clear in the series file...
- Lukas
On 11.03.2010 12:58, Christian Thalinger wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-03-10 at 17:04 +0100, Lukas Stadler wrote:
>
>>
Changeset: 4aec48af19fb
Author:twisti
Date: 2010-03-11 13:04 +0100
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/mlvm/mlvm/langtools/rev/4aec48af19fb
Rebased to jdk7-b85.
! series
___
mlvm-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.openjdk
Changeset: f93f23bb3f1e
Author:twisti
Date: 2010-03-11 13:04 +0100
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/mlvm/mlvm/jdk/rev/f93f23bb3f1e
Rebased to jdk7-b85.
! series
___
mlvm-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.openjdk.java.
Changeset: 5211c0a2aff0
Author:twisti
Date: 2010-03-11 13:04 +0100
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/mlvm/mlvm/hotspot/rev/5211c0a2aff0
Rebased to jdk7-b85.
! indy-c1-x86-6919934.patch
! series
___
mlvm-dev mailing list
[email protected]
On Wed, 2010-03-10 at 17:04 +0100, Lukas Stadler wrote:
> Hi everybody!
>
> As you've probably seen I've pushed a new coroutine implementation into
> the repository.
I'm just rebasing the mlvm patches to the latest code drop and HotSpot's
coro.patch does not apply cleanly on top of the other pat
