Re: coro patch issue

2010-05-11 Thread Tuolin Chen
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 6:07 AM, John Rose wrote: > On May 11, 2010, at 7:45 AM, Tuolin Chen wrote: > > > I'm new to mlvm and I'm trying to get Lukas' coro.patch to work. > > > > I grabbed the source and patches according to openjdk and mlvm build > instructions. Everything is done on my laptop r

hg: mlvm/mlvm/hotspot: patch porting problem caused by 6939930

2010-05-11 Thread john . r . rose
Changeset: d030826b2845 Author:jrose Date: 2010-05-11 18:26 -0700 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/mlvm/mlvm/hotspot/rev/d030826b2845 patch porting problem caused by 6939930 + post-6939930-adjust.patch ! series ___ mlvm-dev mailing list m

Re: Bug in MethodHandles.convertArguments

2010-05-11 Thread Rémi Forax
Le 12/05/2010 02:20, John Rose a écrit : > On May 11, 2010, at 4:49 PM, Rémi Forax wrote: > > >> I only use jdk7 binaries and I haven't found the time to test >> with the mlvm repository. >> > > OK. I'm about to promote some new code to JDK7 and I would like to know ASAP > if it breaks

hg: mlvm/mlvm/langtools: meth, indy: rebase to bsd-port

2010-05-11 Thread john . r . rose
Changeset: edbc97c550e4 Author:jrose Date: 2010-05-11 17:49 -0700 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/mlvm/mlvm/langtools/rev/edbc97c550e4 meth, indy: rebase to bsd-port ! meth-ing-6939134.patch ! series ___ mlvm-dev mailing list mlvm-dev@op

hg: mlvm/mlvm/jdk: meth, indy: rebase to bsd-port

2010-05-11 Thread john . r . rose
Changeset: 25f53668dd02 Author:jrose Date: 2010-05-11 17:49 -0700 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/mlvm/mlvm/jdk/rev/25f53668dd02 meth, indy: rebase to bsd-port ! series ___ mlvm-dev mailing list mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net http://mail.open

hg: mlvm/mlvm/hotspot: meth, indy: rebase to bsd-port

2010-05-11 Thread john . r . rose
Changeset: 1534f8ebcf9a Author:jrose Date: 2010-05-11 17:48 -0700 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/mlvm/mlvm/hotspot/rev/1534f8ebcf9a meth, indy: rebase to bsd-port ! series ___ mlvm-dev mailing list mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net http://mail.

Re: jvm lang summit in July?

2010-05-11 Thread John Rose
On May 10, 2010, at 5:41 PM, John Rose wrote: > The web server won't deliver my new content. OK, here's a step forward: http://jvmlangsummit.com/ Of course, the agenda is mostly empty space, but that's why our CFP is out. Your move! :-) -- John _

Re: Bug in MethodHandles.convertArguments

2010-05-11 Thread John Rose
On May 11, 2010, at 4:49 PM, Rémi Forax wrote: > I only use jdk7 binaries and I haven't found the time to test > with the mlvm repository. OK. I'm about to promote some new code to JDK7 and I would like to know ASAP if it breaks or fixes your code. Can you send me a JAR file to run as a test?

Re: Bug in MethodHandles.convertArguments

2010-05-11 Thread Rémi Forax
Le 12/05/2010 01:02, John Rose a écrit : > On May 11, 2010, at 3:27 AM, Rémi Forax wrote: > > >> I am currently not a able to call that method because converting >> an int to an object doesn't work. >> > > This feels like version skew. I'm trying to reproduce it locally. > > If your code

Re: Bug in MethodHandles.convertArguments

2010-05-11 Thread John Rose
On May 11, 2010, at 3:27 AM, Rémi Forax wrote: > I am currently not a able to call that method because converting > an int to an object doesn't work. This feels like version skew. I'm trying to reproduce it locally. If your code doesn't work then my unit tests shouldn't either; but they do wor

Re: coro patch issue

2010-05-11 Thread John Rose
On May 11, 2010, at 7:45 AM, Tuolin Chen wrote: > I'm new to mlvm and I'm trying to get Lukas' coro.patch to work. > > I grabbed the source and patches according to openjdk and mlvm build > instructions. Everything is done on my laptop running Ubuntu 10.04 64bit > version. Only coro patch is ap

coro patch issue

2010-05-11 Thread Tuolin Chen
Hi all, I'm new to mlvm and I'm trying to get Lukas' coro.patch to work. I grabbed the source and patches according to openjdk and mlvm build instructions. Everything is done on my laptop running Ubuntu 10.04 64bit version. Only coro patch is applied. Though it didn't apply cleanly with latest co

Re: Bug in MethodHandles.convertArguments

2010-05-11 Thread Raffaello Giulietti
On 2010-05-11 12:27, Rémi Forax wrote: > Le 11/05/2010 09:31, Raffaello Giulietti a écrit : >> Yes, this seems a bug to me, too. >> >> What about converting to Integer.class instead of int.class and letting >> the boxing duties to the language compiler? >> >> Raffaello >> Mmmm, I see. Howeve

Re: Bug in MethodHandles.convertArguments

2010-05-11 Thread Rémi Forax
Le 11/05/2010 09:31, Raffaello Giulietti a écrit : > Yes, this seems a bug to me, too. > > What about converting to Integer.class instead of int.class and letting > the boxing duties to the language compiler? > > Raffaello > This code is extracted from a bigger code that try to avoid boxing if

Re: Bug in MethodHandles.convertArguments

2010-05-11 Thread Raffaello Giulietti
Yes, this seems a bug to me, too. What about converting to Integer.class instead of int.class and letting the boxing duties to the language compiler? Raffaello On 2010-05-10 21:11, Rémi Forax wrote: > For me it's a new bug. > I have checked with jdk7 latest binaries > I will check with the mlvm