I'm tardy getting to the main point of this, but here it is:
Thanks, Jim, for finding and diagnosing the bug in the MHs code.
And thanks, Kirill, for pointing out the tautological use of bindTo.
I'll push a fix and a unit test shortly.
I had to change TestFilter.java at one point:
/
On Jan 28, 2011, at 7:09 AM, Jim Laskey wrote:
> Unfortunate was an incomplete thought.
>
> What I was thinking was, that there was likely no trivial way to treat
> exactInvoker(target.type()).bindTo(target) as identity (in bindTo) when
> !target.isVarargsCollector(). Likely moot as MH optimiz
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Rémi Forax wrote:
> Charles, do you use ASM 4 or ASM 3.3 ?
I am still using ASM 3.3 and Linkage to bind indy call sites.
- Charlie
___
mlvm-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/
On 02/03/2011 10:17 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 6:33 AM, Christian Thalinger
> wrote:
>> On Jan 31, 2011, at 8:39 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
>>> Hello friends! After months on "vacation" from indy, I managed to
>>> spend some time this weekend updating JRuby's
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 6:33 AM, Christian Thalinger
wrote:
> On Jan 31, 2011, at 8:39 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
>> Hello friends! After months on "vacation" from indy, I managed to
>> spend some time this weekend updating JRuby's indy support. But this
>> email is to ask about the inlining
On Jan 31, 2011, at 8:39 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
> Hello friends! After months on "vacation" from indy, I managed to
> spend some time this weekend updating JRuby's indy support. But this
> email is to ask about the inlining flag tweaks that still seem to be
> required.
Does this mean I c
