Hi Christian,
Thanks for looking into this bug. It is possible that the bug is due
to a problem of building MLVM on a Mac since there are ongoing
discussions between John Rose and Stephen Bannasch at the moment.
May I suggest that we wait until the build problems are sorted before
looking further
Am 17.03.2011 19:39, schrieb Charles Oliver Nutter:
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 10:39 AM, Jochen Theodorou wrote:
[...]
> I would also be worried, but less so, about the numbers of
> SoftReferences and whether they'd impact GC. A typical app will have
> thousands of call sites, after all.
I think I
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 10:39 AM, Jochen Theodorou wrote:
>
> Because of my mistake Charles made the next one and replied only to me,
> wehre as I think he wanted to reply to the list as well. So I attach that
> mail below my answer in full.
Grr. I hate mailing lists that don't reply to list. I d
Because of my mistake Charles made the next one and replied only to me,
wehre as I think he wanted to reply to the list as well. So I attach
that mail below my answer in full.
Am 17.03.2011 17:04, schrieb Charles Oliver Nutter:
[...]
> For us, the cached object is just a tuple of an int and a
>
On Mar 14, 2011, at 2:28 PM, Christian Thalinger wrote:
> On Mar 7, 2011, at 10:15 AM, Howard Lovatt wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I got the following when trying to use CallSites on Stephen Bannasch's
>> latest build (which isn't the latest latest build and therefore this
>> issue might have been found alr
Am 16.03.2011 20:06, schrieb Charles Oliver Nutter:
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 3:36 AM, Jochen Theodorou wrote:
>> The result, should I have understood correctly, will be, that each
>> scriptn will cause the former scriptn (lastScript) to be referenced in a
>> way that prefents that from being garb
