Changeset: 98c8fe482b11
Author:jrose
Date: 2011-05-04 20:04 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/mlvm/mlvm/jdk/rev/98c8fe482b11
meth-conv: unit test coverage > 80% of adapter types
! meth-conv-6939861.patch
___
mlvm-dev mailing list
mlv
Changeset: 6dfee218b9a7
Author:jrose
Date: 2011-05-04 20:02 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/mlvm/mlvm/hotspot/rev/6dfee218b9a7
meth-conv: review comment
! meth-conv-6939861.patch
___
mlvm-dev mailing list
mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net
Now I am getting a compile error in hotspot/src/cpu/x86/vm/frame_x86.inline.hpp
The error only occurs when the coro pathces are applied.
details from console ...
Generating precompiled header precompiled.hpp.gch
mkdir -p .
/Users/stephen/dev/java/src/mlvm/sources/ALT_COMPILER_PATH/g++ -D_ALLBSD_
Changeset: 23711c7b5e01
Author:Lukas Stadler
Date: 2011-05-04 15:39 +0200
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/mlvm/mlvm/hotspot/rev/23711c7b5e01
coro: add coro split patch files
+ coro-meth.patch
+ coro-standalone.patch
Changeset: 377cca74da82
Author:Lukas Stadler
Date: 201
On May 4, 2011, at 3:08 PM, John Rose wrote:
> On May 4, 2011, at 5:50 AM, Christian Thalinger wrote:
>
>> I don't know how you get over this:
>>
>> src/share/vm/prims/methodHandles.hpp:487: error: conflicting declaration
>> ‘OopClosure* f’
>> src/share/vm/prims/methodHandles.hpp:487: error: ‘f’
At 11:53 AM +0200 5/4/11, Lukas Stadler wrote:
>Hm - that seems weird.
>Could you perhaps do me a favour and check if both "coro.patch" and
>"coro-meth.patch" are being applied?
>
>I had to split off a part of the patch that has to be applied
>differently if the meth patches are present.
>So now it
On May 4, 2011, at 5:50 AM, Christian Thalinger wrote:
> I don't know how you get over this:
>
> src/share/vm/prims/methodHandles.hpp:487: error: conflicting declaration
> ‘OopClosure* f’
> src/share/vm/prims/methodHandles.hpp:487: error: ‘f’ has a previous
> declaration as ‘const frame& f’
A
Changeset: 8ba517c36be3
Author:jrose
Date: 2011-05-04 06:07 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/mlvm/mlvm/hotspot/rev/8ba517c36be3
meth-conv: reapply lost merge from 76c1e87d8341
! meth-conv-6939861.patch
___
mlvm-dev mailing list
mlvm
On May 4, 2011, at 2:36 PM, john.r.r...@oracle.com wrote:
> Changeset: 23a80231951e
> Author:jrose
> Date: 2011-05-04 05:36 -0700
> URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/mlvm/mlvm/hotspot/rev/23a80231951e
>
> meth-conv: process exceptions through ricochets, improve argument spreading
>
>
Changeset: 23a80231951e
Author:jrose
Date: 2011-05-04 05:36 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/mlvm/mlvm/hotspot/rev/23a80231951e
meth-conv: process exceptions through ricochets, improve argument spreading
! meth-conv-6939861.patch
__
Changeset: 822943dfec86
Author:jrose
Date: 2011-05-04 05:35 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/mlvm/mlvm/jdk/rev/822943dfec86
meth-conv: use ricochet frames, improve argument spreading
! meth-conv-6939861.patch
___
mlvm-dev mailing li
On 05/03/2011 11:22 PM, Rémi Forax wrote:
> On 05/03/2011 10:53 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
>> Brainstorming coro package names...
>>
>> java.lang.invoke isn't bad, perhaps, but it is a different form of
>> invocation than invokedynamic.
>>
>> This is a core JVM feature, so something under ja
Hm - that seems weird.
Could you perhaps do me a favour and check if both "coro.patch" and
"coro-meth.patch" are being applied?
I had to split off a part of the patch that has to be applied
differently if the meth patches are present.
So now it's either "coro-standalone.patch" and "coro.patch" o
13 matches
Mail list logo
