I ran the same test on a slightly older laptop with both JDK 7u7 and JDK
8-ea-bin-b59-windows-x64-04_oct_2012. Hardware is i5 M430 - 1 CPU x 2 Cores
x 2 HT running Windows 7, 64 bit.
The results are promising in JDK 8 for MethodHandles and strangely,
Reflection and direct calls were slower than JD
Changeset: aa8f59e8372f
Author:jrose
Date: 2012-10-12 12:35 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/mlvm/mlvm/hotspot/rev/aa8f59e8372f
value-obj: first cut
! series
! value-obj.patch < final-obj.patch
! value-obj.txt
___
mlvm-dev mailing l
On Oct 9, 2012, at 5:27 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
> I reported this to Christian, but thought I'd toss it here in case
> someone else runs into it.
>
> It appears that C1 (tier 1) is failing to compile a indy + MH virtual
> target into a proper overridden call. In other words, it doesn't
Could you rerun the test with a recent JDK 8 build?
-- Chris
On Oct 10, 2012, at 3:02 PM, Ashwin Jayaprakash
wrote:
> Hi, I was looking at the Java 7 InvokeDynamic/MethodHandle feature set and I
> was curious to know how it performed compared to good old Reflection.
>
> I had refrained from
