On Apr 3, 2014, at 6:33 PM, Christian Thalinger
wrote:
> Of course they are popular because these are the type names. There is no
> type L; it’s an object. I don’t understand why we have to use different
> names just because they are used in other namespaces. This is not a C define.
They s
On Mar 26, 2014, at 8:01 AM, Vladimir Ivanov
wrote:
> Here's a version with the new naming scheme:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~vlivanov/8037210/webrev.03.naming
>
> I like existing naming scheme and OBJECT/VOID/LONG/etc names are quite
> popular(e.g. Wrapper & ASM (Opcodes) use them).
Of c
