Hi Peter,
> On 27 May 2016, at 12:41, Peter Levart wrote:
>
> Hi Paul,
>
> On 05/26/2016 01:20 PM, Paul Sandoz wrote:
>> Hi Peter,
>>
>> Opportunistically if your LinearProbeHashtable works out then i am wondering
>> if we could replace the use of CHM within
>> MethodType.ConcurrentWeakInter
I don't see the issue if the lookup object represent the proxy class itself
restricted to only access to public methods.
Rémi
- Mail original -
> De: "Peter Levart"
> À: "Da Vinci Machine Project" , "jochen Theodorou"
>
> Envoyé: Vendredi 27 Mai 2016 12:50:34
> Objet: Re: proxy an in
Hi,
I think the main problem here is that by providing the InvocationHandler
with a Lookup that could provide "invokespecial" MHs for the proxy
interface(s) could be abused. Anyone can create a Proxy for any public
interface and supply its own InvocationHandler which could be used to
"steal"
Hi Paul,
On 05/26/2016 01:20 PM, Paul Sandoz wrote:
Hi Peter,
Opportunistically if your LinearProbeHashtable works out then i am wondering if
we could replace the use of CHM within MethodType.ConcurrentWeakInternSet,
which only uses get/putIfAbsent/remove.
Thereby CHM can use VarHandles wit
