Thanks Peter - I'd like that too.
Another benefit is that it would (presumably) force IDEs to support the
syntax so that you could this reference to, in your example, someMethod().
We had a problem in our large-ish codebase with methods that looked unused
to the IDE (and hence the casual reader),
Does anyone here know the best way to engage with the Eclipse developers on
this kind of thing?
We will try their mailing list (
http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/jdt-debug-dev/), but it's eerily
quiet
George
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 3:29 PM, MacGregor, Duncan (GE Energy Management) <
dunca
e'd be interested in coming to
one in Europe, particularly if it preceded/followed another European conf
he would like to attend.
Please let me know how plans progress and if there's anything I can do to
help.
Yours, George
George Marrows
General Electric
Cambridge, UK
On Wed, O
Christian --
Duncan Macgregor and I have a large desktop application that makes very
heavy use of indy.
As Duncan reported recently, we're also seeing increased memory usage and
(probably) decreased performance under u40.
Will contact you privately with details of how we can get you access.
-- G
[resend after getting stuck in moderation first time]
I was just checking out update 12 b3 with our Magik implementation on 64
bit Windows.
Does b3 contain the backport of the Java 8 invokedynamic impl that I
believe was planned? I can't quite tell from the jdk7u-dev list.
Anyway, something has
