On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Tom Rodriguez wrote:
> One thing I we should fix is that the bytecodes of the method handle adapter
> shouldn't count against the DesiredMethodLimit, in the same way they don't
> count against the inline depth.
Yeah, I think I'm hitting that often now that I'm e
>> I guess my concern is that the original (long) version may or may not
>> inline, but obviously doesn't degrade as badly. Why does the degraded
>> performance of the long form suffer so much? Ruby is a very terse
>> language, often resulting in methods that represent a lot of code. I'm
>> using i
On Aug 10, 2011, at 6:21 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 9:26 AM, Christian Thalinger
> wrote:
>> Here are the numbers for JDK 7 b147, 7071307+7071653, and
>> 7071307+7071653+7071709:
>>
>> 7071307: MethodHandle bimorphic inlining should consider the frequency
>> 707
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 11:21 AM, Charles Oliver Nutter
wrote:
> I guess my concern is that the original (long) version may or may not
> inline, but obviously doesn't degrade as badly. Why does the degraded
> performance of the long form suffer so much? Ruby is a very terse
> language, often resul
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 9:26 AM, Christian Thalinger
wrote:
> Here are the numbers for JDK 7 b147, 7071307+7071653, and
> 7071307+7071653+7071709:
>
> 7071307: MethodHandle bimorphic inlining should consider the frequency
> 7071653: JSR 292: call site change notification should be pushed not pull
On Aug 8, 2011, at 8:21 PM, Christian Thalinger wrote:
>
> On Aug 8, 2011, at 6:39 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Christian Thalinger
>> wrote:
>>> Since I have the basic push-notification of CallSites I'm now looking into
>>> push-notification of Switch
On Aug 8, 2011, at 6:39 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Christian Thalinger
> wrote:
>> Since I have the basic push-notification of CallSites I'm now looking into
>> push-notification of SwitchPoints:
>>
>> 7071709: JSR 292: switchpoint invalidation should be
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Christian Thalinger
wrote:
> Since I have the basic push-notification of CallSites I'm now looking into
> push-notification of SwitchPoints:
>
> 7071709: JSR 292: switchpoint invalidation should be pushed not pulled
>
> Basically it should be the same, just needs s
On Aug 8, 2011, at 4:01 PM, Rémi Forax wrote:
> On 08/08/2011 03:51 PM, Christian Thalinger wrote:
>> Since I have the basic push-notification of CallSites I'm now looking into
>> push-notification of SwitchPoints:
>>
>> 7071709: JSR 292: switchpoint invalidation should be pushed not pulled
>>
On 08/08/2011 03:51 PM, Christian Thalinger wrote:
> Since I have the basic push-notification of CallSites I'm now looking into
> push-notification of SwitchPoints:
>
> 7071709: JSR 292: switchpoint invalidation should be pushed not pulled
>
> Basically it should be the same, just needs some addit
Since I have the basic push-notification of CallSites I'm now looking into
push-notification of SwitchPoints:
7071709: JSR 292: switchpoint invalidation should be pushed not pulled
Basically it should be the same, just needs some additional love in the
compiler.
I looked into JRuby's usage of
11 matches
Mail list logo
