On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 9:52 PM, Stephen Bannasch
stephen.banna...@deanbrook.org wrote:
At 3:03 PM -0500 11/30/11, Stephen Bannasch wrote:
Benchmark code here: https://gist.github.com/1410423
The hpricot benchmark is also slowed down consdierably.
I have found more issues in my invokedynamic
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 2:23 AM, Charles Oliver Nutter
head...@headius.com wrote:
I am still seeing rebinding in profiles of some of the remaining slow
benchmarks, so I'm missing something.
Bleah, I seem to have found the problem.
If I disable the use of SwitchPoint for
At 3:29 AM -0600 12/1/11, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
This is a pretty disappointing finding. I'm not yet sure whether it's
a bug in SwitchPoint optimization or in JRuby's use of SwitchPoint,
but I'd like to see your numbers with and without this flag.
Latest JRuby master, on Java 1.6.0_27,
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 9:47 AM, Stephen Bannasch
stephen.banna...@deanbrook.org wrote:
At 3:29 AM -0600 12/1/11, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
This is a pretty disappointing finding. I'm not yet sure whether it's
a bug in SwitchPoint optimization or in JRuby's use of SwitchPoint,
but I'd like to
Hi Charlie,
Is your latest work going on in the indy_update branch?
I have a simple Ruby xml processing benchmark that compares several Ruby XML
libraries including rexml which is part of the
Ruby standard library.
My test measures the time to do the following 100 times:
- open 98k XML
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Stephen Bannasch
stephen.banna...@deanbrook.org wrote:
Hi Charlie,
Is your latest work going on in the indy_update branch?
No, that's old stuff. I should wipe it out. I can explain your perf
issue below, though.
I have a simple Ruby xml processing benchmark
I should add that if you're running this against a u2ish build and
seeing poor performance, we need to talk. I'm not seeing that locally,
and you shouldn't see it either.
- Charlie
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter
head...@headius.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 2:03 PM,
At 2:43 PM -0600 11/30/11, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
I should add that if you're running this against a u2ish build and
seeing poor performance, we need to talk. I'm not seeing that locally,
and you shouldn't see it either.
Here's what I am testing with: Java 1.6.0_27 and macosx-port and mlvm
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Stephen Bannasch
stephen.banna...@deanbrook.org wrote:
user system total real
rexml 73.54 0.00 73.54 ( 73.54)
hpricot 6.483000 0.00 6.483000 ( 6.483000)
I may have found one big problem, using some rexml benchmarks I found.
The instance-variable logic I just added seems like it might not be
working right. It was supposed to be experimental and turned off, but
I used the wrong flag.
Invokedynamic disabled (-Xcompile.invokedynamic=false)
Parsing
At 5:25 PM -0600 11/30/11, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Stephen Bannasch
stephen.banna...@deanbrook.org wrote:
user system totalreal
rexml 73.54 0.00 73.54 ( 73.54)
hpricot
Hello friends!
Just updating you on the status of JRuby + invokedynamic, for those of
you following along.
About halfway through this month I did another pass at getting tests
passing with invokedynamic enabled, and finally turned on all uses (at
the time) of indy in JRuby! Hooray!
Last week, I
12 matches
Mail list logo
