Re: LinearProbeHashtable Re: ClassValue perf?

2016-05-27 Thread Paul Sandoz
Hi Peter, > On 27 May 2016, at 12:41, Peter Levart wrote: > > Hi Paul, > > On 05/26/2016 01:20 PM, Paul Sandoz wrote: >> Hi Peter, >> >> Opportunistically if your LinearProbeHashtable works out then i am wondering >> if we could replace the use of CHM within >> MethodType.ConcurrentWeakInter

Re: LinearProbeHashtable Re: ClassValue perf?

2016-05-27 Thread Peter Levart
Hi Paul, On 05/26/2016 01:20 PM, Paul Sandoz wrote: Hi Peter, Opportunistically if your LinearProbeHashtable works out then i am wondering if we could replace the use of CHM within MethodType.ConcurrentWeakInternSet, which only uses get/putIfAbsent/remove. Thereby CHM can use VarHandles wit

LinearProbeHashtable Re: ClassValue perf?

2016-05-26 Thread Paul Sandoz
Hi Peter, Opportunistically if your LinearProbeHashtable works out then i am wondering if we could replace the use of CHM within MethodType.ConcurrentWeakInternSet, which only uses get/putIfAbsent/remove. Thereby CHM can use VarHandles without inducing a circular dependency. Paul. > On 26 May