On 24.05.2016 15:33, Peter Levart wrote:
On 05/24/2016 01:41 PM, Peter Levart wrote:
Hm,
It seems that my example will not help much. It also seems that the
only problem with plain:
static final ClassValue META_CLASS_CV = new
ClassValue() {
@Override
protected MetaClass co
On 05/24/2016 01:41 PM, Peter Levart wrote:
Hm,
It seems that my example will not help much. It also seems that the
only problem with plain:
static final ClassValue META_CLASS_CV = new
ClassValue() {
@Override
protected MetaClass computeValue(Class type) {
On 05/24/2016 10:26 AM, Jochen Theodorou wrote:
Peter, I fully understand if you cannot reply to this mail easily,
just wanted to ping to ensure this is not forgotten ;)
Sorry Jochen, I forgot about it... Thanks for reminding me!
On 20.05.2016 01:33, Jochen Theodorou wrote:
On 19.05.2016 2
Peter, I fully understand if you cannot reply to this mail easily, just
wanted to ping to ensure this is not forgotten ;)
On 20.05.2016 01:33, Jochen Theodorou wrote:
On 19.05.2016 21:32, Peter Levart wrote:
[...]
a ClassValue instance can be thought of as a component of a compound
key. Togeth
On 19.05.2016 21:32, Peter Levart wrote:
[...]
a ClassValue instance can be thought of as a component of a compound
key. Together with a Class, they form a tuple (aClass, aClassValue) that
can be associated with an "associated value", AV. And yes, the AVs
associated with tuple containing a partic
A small correction...
On 05/19/2016 09:32 PM, Peter Levart wrote:
// the public API
public MetaClass getInstanceFor(Class type) {
This should of course read:
// the public API
public *static* MetaClass getInstanceFor(Class type) {
Regards, Peter
__
Hi Jochen,
I'll try to answer your questions as profoundly as I can...
On 05/19/2016 04:27 PM, Jochen Theodorou wrote:
Hi,
at the beginning of this year I had an exchange with Peter Lavart
about JDK-8136353 (see
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/mlvm-dev/2016-January/006563.html),
and
Hi,
at the beginning of this year I had an exchange with Peter Lavart about
JDK-8136353 (see
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/mlvm-dev/2016-January/006563.html),
and that is probably based on wrong assumptions. But I must confess I
still have trouble understanding ClassValue semantics.
