On 04/25/2014 12:44 PM, Paul Sandoz wrote:
On Apr 25, 2014, at 12:04 PM, Peter Levart wrote:
This is a ping for any Reviewer and also a question for Vladimir.
Hello Vladimir,
What do you think about the classloader issue in the resolving of classes in
MemberName.getMethodType() described b
On Apr 25, 2014, at 12:04 PM, Peter Levart wrote:
> This is a ping for any Reviewer and also a question for Vladimir.
>
> Hello Vladimir,
>
> What do you think about the classloader issue in the resolving of classes in
> MemberName.getMethodType() described below?
>
I looked a bit more clos
This is a ping for any Reviewer and also a question for Vladimir.
Hello Vladimir,
What do you think about the classloader issue in the resolving of
classes in MemberName.getMethodType() described below?
Regards, Peter
On 04/23/2014 04:21 PM, Paul Sandoz wrote:
Hi Peter,
IMHO such security
Hi Peter,
IMHO such security manager usage by the test is v. fragile and we should try
and find a safer alternative if possible.
However, there may also be an issue with lambda form code. (About a month ago i
too was looking, internally, at this kind of issue and thought there was a
questionab
Hi,
I'm cross-posting this on the mlvm-dev mailing list, because I think it
concerns internal MHs implementation.
While replacing some inner classes with lambdas in java.lang.UNIXProcess
class, a jtreg test started failing. This test is employing a security
manager with an unusual configurat
