Am 14.02.2014 03:55, schrieb John Rose:
[...]
> If this is how it works, it's OK as long as only a few people are
> involved in the handshake. Perhaps somebody in the know needs to write
> a little blog entry or wiki page on how line numbering works.
to be more exact: How line numbering has to be
On Feb 4, 2014, at 4:21 AM, Jochen Theodorou wrote:
> If I know how it is supposed to look like, I can change our compiler to
> emit the line number information exactly where suggested and then see if
> it works. But for that I missing that information :(
Here is the information I know about,
thanks for reacting John,
now... yes, invokedynmic doesn't have the problem, so it might be a
problem with invokestatic.
The problem with the thing simply is, I don't know what bytecode is
supposed to be correct or if there is actually a problem with the JVM. I
kind of doubt the later, since i
Hi, Jochen. I pinged a colleague about this, and here are his comments. Do
they help?
— John
On Feb 3, 2014, at 7:43 AM, Jochen Theodorou wrote:
> No ideas at all?
Begin forwarded message:
From: "[email protected]"
Subject: Re: Fwd: problems with step debugging
Date: January 24,
No ideas at all?
Am 24.01.2014 12:07, schrieb Jochen Theodorou:
> Hi all,
>
> My question is related to the JVM, but today to the debugging interface
> actually. Or o be more exact in what exact cases the JVM gives out the
> events when using step filtering.
>
> The background is that I try to fix
