Le 22 avr. 2011 à 19:29, John Rose a écrit :
> On Apr 22, 2011, at 7:42 AM, Rémi Forax wrote:
>>>
>>> My first move would be to regard this attribute as reserved to a "Code"
>>> attribute,
>>> but it seems that data sharing would be increased by putting it a the class
>>> level.
>>
>> The Boo
Le 22 avr. 2011 à 16:42, Rémi Forax a écrit :
>
>>> This is a possibility, hoping that the entry ticket to the ASM API is not
>>> to high.
>>>
>>> While developing the code to read/write a JDK7 class file, I noticed what I
>>> think
>>> is a typo on the
>>> "http://download.java.net/jdk7/doc
On Apr 22, 2011, at 7:42 AM, Rémi Forax wrote:
>>
>> My first move would be to regard this attribute as reserved to a "Code"
>> attribute,
>> but it seems that data sharing would be increased by putting it a the class
>> level.
>
> The BootstrapMethods attribute is a class attribute.
> And you'
>> This is a possibility, hoping that the entry ticket to the ASM API is not to
>> high.
>>
>> While developing the code to read/write a JDK7 class file, I noticed what I
>> think
>> is a typo on the
>> "http://download.java.net/jdk7/docs/api/java/lang/invoke/package-summary.html";
>> page. The
On 04/22/2011 07:42 AM, fo...@x9c.fr wrote:
> Le 21 avr. 2011 à 21:36, Rémi Forax a écrit :
>
>> On 04/21/2011 09:20 PM, fo...@x9c.fr wrote:
>>> Le 21 avr. 2011 à 19:07, John Rose a écrit :
>>>
On Apr 21, 2011, at 9:41 AM, fo...@x9c.fr wrote:
> Thanks for the information.
> I wond
Le 22 avr. 2011 à 07:42, fo...@x9c.fr a écrit :
>
> Le 21 avr. 2011 à 21:36, Rémi Forax a écrit :
>
>> On 04/21/2011 09:20 PM, fo...@x9c.fr wrote:
>>> Le 21 avr. 2011 à 19:07, John Rose a écrit :
>>>
On Apr 21, 2011, at 9:41 AM, fo...@x9c.fr wrote:
> Thanks for the information.
Le 21 avr. 2011 à 21:36, Rémi Forax a écrit :
> On 04/21/2011 09:20 PM, fo...@x9c.fr wrote:
>> Le 21 avr. 2011 à 19:07, John Rose a écrit :
>>
>>> On Apr 21, 2011, at 9:41 AM, fo...@x9c.fr wrote:
>>>
Thanks for the information.
I wondered whether the EG had a "hidden" set of tests cas
On 04/21/2011 09:20 PM, fo...@x9c.fr wrote:
> Le 21 avr. 2011 à 19:07, John Rose a écrit :
>
>> On Apr 21, 2011, at 9:41 AM, fo...@x9c.fr wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks for the information.
>>> I wondered whether the EG had a "hidden" set of tests cases...
>> I think there are two "hidden" sets, neither of w
Le 21 avr. 2011 à 19:07, John Rose a écrit :
> On Apr 21, 2011, at 9:41 AM, fo...@x9c.fr wrote:
>
>> Thanks for the information.
>> I wondered whether the EG had a "hidden" set of tests cases...
>
> I think there are two "hidden" sets, neither of which are (AFAIK) open
> source: There is an e
On Apr 21, 2011, at 9:41 AM, fo...@x9c.fr wrote:
> Thanks for the information.
> I wondered whether the EG had a "hidden" set of tests cases...
I think there are two "hidden" sets, neither of which are (AFAIK) open source:
There is an engineering group in Oracle which is developing JCK tests.
Le 21 avr. 2011 à 10:32, Christian Thalinger a écrit :
> On Apr 12, 2011, at 7:04 PM, fo...@x9c.fr wrote:
>> Dear list,
>>
>> Is there a blessed set of class files that exhibit the various
>> possible uses of the JSR 292 features. Such a set would be
>> very useful to me in order to test an asse
On Apr 12, 2011, at 7:04 PM, fo...@x9c.fr wrote:
> Dear list,
>
> Is there a blessed set of class files that exhibit the various
> possible uses of the JSR 292 features. Such a set would be
> very useful to me in order to test an assembler/disassembler
> tool.
>
> Thanks in advance for any pointe
Dear list,
Is there a blessed set of class files that exhibit the various
possible uses of the JSR 292 features. Such a set would be
very useful to me in order to test an assembler/disassembler
tool.
Thanks in advance for any pointer.
Kind regards,
Xavier Clerc
13 matches
Mail list logo
