το Sep 13, 2009, επι τῳ 6:53 AM, Rémi Forax εγραψα:
> Le 13/09/2009 02:38, John Rose a écrit :
>>
>> The backport a great option for experimentation, since it does not
>> require a pre-release JVM. Its performance seems to be comparable
>> to the current MLVM JVM. Basically what you get is a
Jochen Theodorou wrote:
> Charles Oliver Nutter schrieb:
>> You could certainly use the interpreter to start prototyping whatever
>> you are working on. I used interpreted mode for much of the JRuby
>> invokedynamic work.
>
> well I wanted to run an optimized Groovy against
> Methodhandles+invoke
Le 13/09/2009 02:38, John Rose a écrit :
On Sep 11, 2009, at 2:36 AM, Jochen Theodorou wrote:
You can also try the backport :)
http://code.google.com/p/jvm-language-runtime/source/browse/#svn/trunk/invokedynamic-backport
well, I will most probably do, since there is nothing else and the VM
im
Le 13/09/2009 08:51, Charles Oliver Nutter a écrit :
> I know it doesn't help Jochen, but I did push latest MLVM build on
> darwin x86-32 to my "invoke dynamic tests" project on Kenai:
>
> http://kenai.com/projects/invoke-dynamic-tests/downloads
>
> I had some trouble with my linux build I'll need
I know it doesn't help Jochen, but I did push latest MLVM build on
darwin x86-32 to my "invoke dynamic tests" project on Kenai:
http://kenai.com/projects/invoke-dynamic-tests/downloads
I had some trouble with my linux build I'll need to poke at for a while.
On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 10:54 PM, Char
On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 7:38 PM, John Rose wrote:
> Also, note that the JVM and the JDK are tightly coupled in the JSR 292
> implementations. At least during JDK7 development, you can't mix and match
> JVMs and JDKs. The best bet will be to use an JDK7 build updated with the
> current MLVM stuff
On Sep 11, 2009, at 2:36 AM, Jochen Theodorou wrote:
You can also try the backport :)
http://code.google.com/p/jvm-language-runtime/source/browse/#svn/
trunk/invokedynamic-backport
well, I will most probably do, since there is nothing else and the VM
implementation is hopefully faster than or
Rémi Forax schrieb:
> Le 11/09/2009 03:08, Jochen Theodorou a écrit :
>> Charles Oliver Nutter schrieb:
>>
>>> You could certainly use the interpreter to start prototyping whatever
>>> you are working on. I used interpreted mode for much of the JRuby
>>> invokedynamic work.
>>>
>> well I
Le 11/09/2009 03:08, Jochen Theodorou a écrit :
> Charles Oliver Nutter schrieb:
>
>> You could certainly use the interpreter to start prototyping whatever
>> you are working on. I used interpreted mode for much of the JRuby
>> invokedynamic work.
>>
> well I wanted to run an optimized Gr
2009/9/10 Jochen Theodorou :
> well I wanted to run an optimized Groovy against
> Methodhandles+invokedynamic and comparing both in the interpreted mode
> will not help much here. If I run normal Groovy with the server hotspot
> against the program with interpreter mode, the other one has no chance
Charles Oliver Nutter schrieb:
> You could certainly use the interpreter to start prototyping whatever
> you are working on. I used interpreted mode for much of the JRuby
> invokedynamic work.
well I wanted to run an optimized Groovy against
Methodhandles+invokedynamic and comparing both in the i
You could certainly use the interpreter to start prototyping whatever
you are working on. I used interpreted mode for much of the JRuby
invokedynamic work.
On Friday, September 11, 2009, Jochen Theodorou wrote:
> Christian Thalinger schrieb:
> [...]
>> I think that was a bug we had once. Is your
Christian Thalinger schrieb:
[...]
> I think that was a bug we had once. Is your mlvm repository up-to-date?
from the same day, so I would say: yes.
> Btw. if the interpreter is fast enough for you, you can now build a
> 64-bit VM. I've pushed the changes a few days ago.
no, the interpreter is
Jochen Theodorou wrote:
> Rémi Forax schrieb:
> [...]
>> and
>>
>> java -XX:+UnlockExperimentalVMOptions -XX:+EnableInvokeDynamic FidgetDemo
>
>
> java -XX:+UnlockExperimentalVMOptions -XX:+EnableInvokeDynamic FidgetDemo
> > #
> > # A fatal error has been detected by the Java Runtime Environme
Charles Oliver Nutter schrieb:
> Client often crashes for me still. Try -server.
same game
bye Jochen
--
Jochen "blackdrag" Theodorou
The Groovy Project Tech Lead (http://groovy.codehaus.org)
http://blackdragsview.blogspot.com/
___
mlvm-dev mailing l
Client often crashes for me still. Try -server.
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 3:42 AM, Jochen Theodorou wrote:
> hi all,
>
> I am in urgend need of an actual VM with MethodHandles, but this is as
> always quuite complicated. This time I created a chroot envrionment for
> 32 bit, that was where I last ti
Rémi Forax schrieb:
[...]
> and
>
> java -XX:+UnlockExperimentalVMOptions -XX:+EnableInvokeDynamic FidgetDemo
java -XX:+UnlockExperimentalVMOptions -XX:+EnableInvokeDynamic FidgetDemo
> #
> # A fatal error has been detected by the Java Runtime Environment:
> #
> # Internal Error (methodHan
Le 09/09/2009 20:55, Jochen Theodorou a écrit :
> Jochen Theodorou schrieb:
>
>> Rémi Forax schrieb:
>>
>>> Le 09/09/2009 20:42, Jochen Theodorou a écrit :
>>>
hi all,
I am in urgend need of an actual VM with MethodHandles, but this is as
always quuite complica
Jochen Theodorou schrieb:
> Rémi Forax schrieb:
>> Le 09/09/2009 20:42, Jochen Theodorou a écrit :
>>> hi all,
>>>
>>> I am in urgend need of an actual VM with MethodHandles, but this is as
>>> always quuite complicated. This time I created a chroot envrionment for
>>> 32 bit, that was where I last
Rémi Forax schrieb:
> Le 09/09/2009 20:42, Jochen Theodorou a écrit :
>> hi all,
>>
>> I am in urgend need of an actual VM with MethodHandles, but this is as
>> always quuite complicated. This time I created a chroot envrionment for
>> 32 bit, that was where I last time had to stop. I managed to ge
Le 09/09/2009 20:42, Jochen Theodorou a écrit :
> hi all,
>
> I am in urgend need of an actual VM with MethodHandles, but this is as
> always quuite complicated. This time I created a chroot envrionment for
> 32 bit, that was where I last time had to stop. I managed to get it
> compiled by the patc
hi all,
I am in urgend need of an actual VM with MethodHandles, but this is as
always quuite complicated. This time I created a chroot envrionment for
32 bit, that was where I last time had to stop. I managed to get it
compiled by the patch that was provided here 5 months ago and finally
had a
22 matches
Mail list logo
