John Rose a écrit :
> On Feb 2, 2009, at 6:35 AM, Rémi Forax wrote:
>
>> Currently, the mth patch allow to call directly a MethoHandle
>> using invokevirtual but also invokeinterface, invokespecial or
>> invokestatic.
>>
>> I wonder why invokeinterface, invokespecial and invokestatic are allowed
>
On Feb 5, 2009, at 1:12 AM, Rémi Forax wrote:
> By the way, the current prototype rely on getMethod (not
> getDeclaredMethod) to find callable methods,
> so it's only possible to reify public methods.
> Is it a known limitation of the current prototype or is the spec
> will only allow find* on
John Rose a écrit :
> On Feb 4, 2009, at 7:38 AM, Rémi Forax wrote:
>
>
>> It seems it's currently impossible to create a user defined method
>> handle
>> because the constructor of MethodHandle take a token (Token)
>> which is not accessible to user code.
>>
>> I remember it was a requirement
John Rose a écrit :
> On Feb 5, 2009, at 1:12 AM, Rémi Forax wrote:
>
>> By the way, the current prototype rely on getMethod (not
>> getDeclaredMethod) to find callable methods,
>> so it's only possible to reify public methods.
>> Is it a known limitation of the current prototype or is the spec wi
