John Rose wrote:
> On Sep 11, 2009, at 3:35 PM, Rémi Forax wrote:
>
>> Christian,
>> the inlining patch currently doesn't work :(
>>
>> in methodHandleWalk.hpp (line 322) :
>>
>> int cpool_oop_reference_put(int tag, int first_index, int
>> second_index) {
>> if (index == 0) return 0; //
Changeset: ee07ee0ed86f
Author:jrose
Date: 2009-09-12 01:14 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/mlvm/mlvm/hotspot/rev/ee07ee0ed86f
indy.compiler.inline: minor bug fixes
! indy.compiler.inline.patch
Changeset: 9f5f4ee14324
Author:jrose
Date: 2009-09-12 01:15 -0700
URL:
I just pushed that fix. I also pushed (what I hope are) the fixes for
the last GC bugs. Please let me know what happens.
-- John
On Sep 12, 2009, at 1:03 AM, Christian Thalinger wrote:
> Ha! Thanks for the explanation, I didn't understand how this compiles
> for me :-)
On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 3:21 AM, John Rose wrote:
> I just pushed that fix. I also pushed (what I hope are) the fixes for
> the last GC bugs. Please let me know what happens.
Updated numbers for Surinx, new build as of a few minutes ago:
~/projects/surinx ➔ jruby --server -J-XX:+UnlockExperim
Changeset: d9f1750f4e74
Author:jrose
Date: 2009-09-12 03:25 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/mlvm/mlvm/hotspot/rev/d9f1750f4e74
nonperm: trivial naming tweak
! nonperm-6863023.patch
___
mlvm-dev mailing list
mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.ne
Le 12/09/2009 11:47, Charles Oliver Nutter a écrit :
> On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 3:21 AM, John Rose wrote:
>
>> I just pushed that fix. I also pushed (what I hope are) the fixes for
>> the last GC bugs. Please let me know what happens.
>>
> Updated numbers for Surinx, new build as of a
On Sep 11, 2009, at 2:36 AM, Jochen Theodorou wrote:
You can also try the backport :)
http://code.google.com/p/jvm-language-runtime/source/browse/#svn/
trunk/invokedynamic-backport
well, I will most probably do, since there is nothing else and the VM
implementation is hopefully faster than or
Changeset: 8800c1fd00fd
Author:jrose
Date: 2009-09-12 19:24 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/mlvm/mlvm/hotspot/rev/8800c1fd00fd
hotswap: initial version from Thomas Wuerthinger
+ hotswap.patch
+ hotswap.txt
! series
___
mlvm-dev mai
On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 7:38 PM, John Rose wrote:
> Also, note that the JVM and the JDK are tightly coupled in the JSR 292
> implementations. At least during JDK7 development, you can't mix and match
> JVMs and JDKs. The best bet will be to use an JDK7 build updated with the
> current MLVM stuff
I know it doesn't help Jochen, but I did push latest MLVM build on
darwin x86-32 to my "invoke dynamic tests" project on Kenai:
http://kenai.com/projects/invoke-dynamic-tests/downloads
I had some trouble with my linux build I'll need to poke at for a while.
On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 10:54 PM, Char
10 matches
Mail list logo
