If the system is moving to an sqlite back end, would it be
advantageous to just instead store the files as blobs in the database?
I understand that this would bloat the size, but no more than an auto
copy would. Well, actually, I understand that an sqlite3 database does
grow significantly larger t
Sure, it's on the todo list for 2.x.
Peter
On Monday 02 March 2009 14:31:26 Patrick Kenny wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> What do people think about a feature for 2.0 that automatically copies
> any added image or sound file to the .mnemosyne directory by default?
> This could eliminate confusion by use
Greetings,
What do people think about a feature for 2.0 that automatically copies
any added image or sound file to the .mnemosyne directory by default?
This could eliminate confusion by users without signficant computer
knowledge about relative paths, and could help them back up their files
m
