imistic! :)
I'm happy the way Mnemosyne is!
I appreciate your great effort on this projects. Thanks!
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 3:52 AM, Peter Bienstman
wrote:
>
> On Friday 20 February 2009 21:30:54 Francisco José Fiuza Lima Júnior wrote:
> > Hi Peter,
> >
> > I'
re my thoughts,
that's all!
I have 1731 cards at the moment.
Grade 2: 7.8%
Grade 3: 17.7%
Grade 4: 44.5%
Grade 5: 33.0%
And the scheduled average is about 45 cards a day!
I'm quite happy with it!
I'm still using Mnemosyne 1.0.1.1 :)
Regards,
Frank
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at
quot;. Grade 2, 3 or 4? Did
you get my point on my explanation of my last e-mail?
Regards,
Frank
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Peter Bienstman
wrote:
>
> On Friday 20 February 2009 18:44:05 Francisco José Fiuza Lima Júnior wrote:
>
> > What do you think Peter?
>
> A
#x27;t clutter the interface, is easy to implement, the
underlying mechanism will stay transparent to the end-user, and will help a
lot of people.
I don't know what would be the best multiplying factors. I just think
grade 2 and 3 should decrease on pessimistic mode.
What do you think
> logs.
>
> Peter
>
> On Thursday 19 February 2009 8:19:29 Francisco José Fiuza Lima Júnior
> wrote:
> > I disagree!
> >
> > What is the point of increasing the interval if you barely remembered it
> > giving a grade 2? Increasing the interval, you will
, querido wrote:
>
> On Feb 19, 9:28 am, Francisco José Fiuza Lima Júnior
> wrote:
> > In my opinion, the algorithm should find an ideal interval for a card,
> > increasing or decreasing it so that you give it a grade 4.
>
> I understand, but hopefully this "ideal in
It doesn't make that much sense now.
Let's say the interval for a card is 50 days, and I grade it 2 because I got
it barely correct.
Will it be better to:
1) increase the interval to 60 days and let me forget it on the next time,
2) or decrease it to 40 days and give it a grade 3 next time becau
SRS = Spaced Repetition Something
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 5:04 PM, Philip Rhoades wrote:
>
> Peter,
>
> Thanks for the note.
>
> SRS? Software Requirements Specification?
>
> Regards,
>
> Phil.
>
>
> Peter Bienstman wrote:
> > That is indeed the way to do it.
> >
> > As this is not a very common
I write the answers for several cards. I just use the windows' notepad.
On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 10:56 AM, Dellamorte
wrote:
>
> you can also write it on a piece of paper and compare it with the
> answer.
>
> On Feb 8, 7:11 pm, Oisín Mac Fhearaí wrote:
> > 2009/2/8 Gwern Branwen
> >
> >
> >
> >
Doing this you will be sort of 'cheating' on the algorithm.
Because when the time to review comes, you will give it a higher grade than
it should get, because you had already reviewed it.
Frank
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 4:15 PM, JCro wrote:
>
> I searched around on the Google Groups page and could
I agree with Peter.
Asking Mnemosyne to do advanced back up functionality is sort of asking
Mnemosyne to edit image files.
My way of not forgetting to backup is to create a recursive task on a
calendar utility (I use outlook) to weekly remind me to send my files to
Gmail.
It would be nice though i
Since it's beta and it's Microsoft I'd rather wait a bit more!
When it gets to its final stable version it probably won't be free.
But thanks for the great tip anyways. If I had more than 1 computer I would
try that!
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 9:55 AM, Francisco José Fiuz
It sounds interesting!
Let us know how it goes after a few weeks of testing!
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 8:56 AM, triguna wrote:
>
> Hi,
> just switched over from Supermemo 2006 to Mnemosyne due to its ease of
> use and well done clean user interface.
>
> One thing I particular love about Mnemosyne
I've never seen it either. Try to install Mnemosyne on a Virtual Machine
(VMWare) and check if it helps. If it does, there is something wrong with
your current OS installation.
Frank
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 12:16 AM, Hugh Chen wrote:
>
> I always uninstall Mnemosyne before reinstalling new vers
I think you are right.
Even for your own deck, if go out for a 2 months vacations when you come
back, the ratings will be messed up, but it will adjust over time.
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 12:10 PM, notstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi there, I have to admit, I may be a little bit overly conc
I agree that 3 buttons that does the same thing is very confusing. I feel
stupid now when I look back and for the past 6 months I was using the
buttons 2-4 thinking that it was making any difference, but it was not!
Making a button too large is ugly. Maybe just show 1 button would do it.
We
I also thought it was a bug, until now!
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 6:51 AM, Peter Bienstman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
> On Friday 17 October 2008 10:48:59 Jason Axelson wrote:
>
> > Perhaps some type of note might be in order? Not sure how to express
> > it nicely though...
>
> It is in the manua
17 matches
Mail list logo
