> So then the scheduling is almost irrelevant, you're saying? Priority queue > doesn't sound like it imposes much ordering, so the algorithm doesn't matter. > Is then the secret sauce, as some of my suggestions proposed, the progressive > editing down of the HTML file?
Well, the date-based cheduling is irrelevant. Priorities actually are used to impose a huge amount of order. SuperMemo allows for both absolute and relative priorities, which can be batch applied across any set of items/categories the user chooses. One of the advantages is the gradual editing of the HTML. But here's the big point of incremental reading: the traditional SuperMemo/Mnemosyne approach is pretty bad at giving you the "big picture." You can't learn the big ideas from flash cards. It's assumed you know what you're doing when you type the cards in. By contrast, incremental reading allows you to read creatively and expose yourself to new information across many genres at once, and has some neat tricks to help you remember what you want. Cheers, Patrick --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mnemosyne-proj-users" group. To post to this group, send email to mnemosyne-proj-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mnemosyne-proj-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
