I like the idea of expanding by default because it fixes my pet peev of not
being able to do a find on page from my mobile browser without first
expanding all sections.
*
*
*
*
*Jared Zimmerman * \\ Director of User Experience \\ Wikimedia
Foundation
M : +1 415 609 4043 | : @JaredZimmerman
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Jon Robson wrote:
> The more I think about it, the more I think, in its current state
> mobile should not collapse sections by default. If you really want to
> find a lower section, scrolling down the page and being able to
> collapse a section to see the next on
I actually like the idea of it expanding as you go down, but we could also make
it optional for users, so that we could get the best of both worlds.
Kevin Rutherford
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 16, 2013, at 3:44 PM, "Steven Walling" wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Jon Robson wro
The more I think about it, the more I think, in its current state
mobile should not collapse sections by default. If you really want to
find a lower section, scrolling down the page and being able to
collapse a section to see the next one is easy, yet if you just want
to read the article in its ent
If we still want to explore dynamically loading article sections (which we
all seemed to be in favor of when we did annual planning back in June),
it's hard for me to imagine how we could realistically pull that off if we
display sections uncollapsed as default.
On a more personal note, I really v
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 7:34 PM, Jon Robson wrote:
> The more I think about it, the more I think, in its current state
> mobile should not collapse sections by default. If you really want to
> find a lower section, scrolling down the page and being able to
> collapse a section to see the next one
At first I want to say the type of device is important too, I use
Xperia "mini" pro for navigating and the screen is so small that if I
want reach a certain section when all sections are uncollapsed that
would be impossible. I suggest to see the type of device too:
1-If someone is navigating via ta
On 09/16/2013 10:34 AM, Jon Robson wrote:
The more I think about it, the more I think, in its current state
mobile should not collapse sections by default.
Please keep them collapsed! As a user, I find the current implementation
very good (and it would be superb if only the data shown was down
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Jon Robson wrote:
> > The more I think about it, the more I think, in its current state
> > mobile should not collapse sections by default. If you really want to
> > find a lower section, scrolling down the page and being able to
> > collapse a section to see the
I think this is more a design question so I generally concede to whatever
the mobile/design team thinks but as a user I really like the auto
compressed nature not because of the loading situations but because of
navigation on the phone. It makes it significantly easier to navigate
around the page a
+ design-l
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Jon Robson wrote:
> The more I think about it, the more I think, in its current state
> mobile should not collapse sections by default. If you really want to
> find a lower section, scrolling down the page and being able to
> collapse a section to see
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Arthur Richards
wrote:
> If we still want to explore dynamically loading article sections (which we
> all seemed to be in favor of when we did annual planning back in June),
> it's hard for me to imagine how we could realistically pull that off if we
> display sec
12 matches
Mail list logo