Oops, wow, sorry for the confusion, I’m really a beta tester, didn’t remember
to join the production beta test :) That makes sense, thanks for the
explanation! But this doesn’t make any sense for me, so I leave the production
alpha now :P
Best,
Florian
Von: Stephen Niedzielski [mailto:s
Hey! Good question. We have two apps, Wikipedia Beta and Wikipedia
(production). The production app also has an alpha group and you're a
member! When we publish the Beta, we often publish an identical[0]
production candidate in the alpha group. If testing of the Beta and the
production alpha goes
Hi,
great! One thing that confuses me: You wrote, that this is only a new release
for the beta app channel, but today I got an update on the production release,
too, with the same changelog as in the beta app. And the new prod-version is
the 109, too? Have I missed an announcement?
Best,
Yes. This should be a client feature, not a Wikidata feature (so something
that is on Wikipedia and Commons)
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 10:54 PM, Jan Ainali
wrote:
> I am with Ryan here, and I believe that is Magnus idea too, the
> autodescription should not be a field in the database, it should be
