+1 can we do that then? Seems like consensus. All bots to wikimedia-dev
I actually thing this also gains more as it gives more visibility to
changes to other devs and more visibility to core changes to mobile
devs.
On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 4:45 AM, Jeff Hobson jhob...@wikimedia.org wrote:
+1 My
Bug setup for this https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T97798 to close
this thread.
On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 10:03 AM, Jon Robson jdlrob...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 can we do that then? Seems like consensus. All bots to wikimedia-dev
I actually thing this also gains more as it gives more visibility to
I'm in favour of moving the bots to another channel (or back to
#wikimedia-dev) too.
–Sam
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 11:00 PM, Monte Hurd mh...@wikimedia.org wrote:
+1
On Apr 30, 2015, at 10:29 AM, Joaquin Oltra Hernandez
jhernan...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Hi!
I've been feeling that the
+1, as a newcomer, the bots create quite a bit of interference. And another
+1 for making the bot channels more specific (Android, iOS, etc).
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 11:29 AM, Joaquin Oltra Hernandez
jhernan...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Hi!
I've been feeling that the signal to noise ratio on
Just a thought: as long as we primarily link to webchat.freenode.net from
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/IRC/Channels the traffic in the channels
should be suited after that tool rather than what some power user have
available.
*Med vänliga hälsningar,Jan Ainali*
Verksamhetschef, Wikimedia
I would favor having the bots on a separate channel as well.
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 1:09 PM, Brian Gerstle bgers...@wikimedia.org
wrote:
I think the point is that it's unrealistic to expect people to handle this
on the client side and they should opt in for those
notifications/messages by
I think the point is that it's unrealistic to expect people to handle this
on the client side and they should opt in for those
notifications/messages by joining that channel (i.e. separating events on
the server side, so it applies to all clients).
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 4:03 PM, Bahodir
