❦ 20 janvier 2016 09:58 +0100, Bjørn Mork :
> The other messages look pretty similar. As you point out: The only
> observable difference is the lack of DNS addresses. And a minor
> difference in the allocated addresses, which may or may not be related.
> You wouldn't happen to know if the oper
Hey,
>>
>> Yes, it should be using the Telit plugin.
>>
>>
>
> I was adding the udev rules for the LE910 in the
> 77-mm-telit-port-types.rules file when I saw the following comment:
>
> # NOTE: Qualcomm Gobi-based devices like the LE920 should not be handled
> # by this plugin, but by the Gobi plu
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 5:34 PM, Aleksander Morgado
wrote:
>
> Yes, it should be using the Telit plugin.
>
>
I was adding the udev rules for the LE910 in the
77-mm-telit-port-types.rules file when I saw the following comment:
# NOTE: Qualcomm Gobi-based devices like the LE920 should not be handl
Bjørn Mork writes:
> Maybe someone here with an XMM7160 modem from another vendor
> can confirm?
Just remembered the Huawei ME936 I have somewhere, so I should be able
to verify this myself.
I'll see if I can dig out both the EM7345 and the ME936 and do some
testing some day. If nothing else, i
Vincent Bernat writes:
So, failing LTE:
> [mm-bearer-mbim.c:212] ip_configuration_query_ready(): IPv4 configuration
> available: 'address, gateway'
> [mm-bearer-mbim.c:218] ip_configuration_query_ready(): IP addresses (1)
> [mm-bearer-mbim.c:222] ip_configuration_query_ready(): IP [0]:
>
