Re: Sierra Wireless EM7455

Hi Dan, Aleksander Thank you very much for having a look into my issue, please see below for more info. On Thu, 2016-07-28 at 10:10 -0500, Dan Williams wrote: [...] > But given that it's a Sierra, I wonder if Nicolas could run the > following on the modem's AT port: > > AT!ERR=0 > AT!GCCLR > >

Re: [PATCH 13/14] zte, udev: avoid making the rules tty-only, and simplify single vendor check

On Thu, 2016-07-28 at 18:42 +0200, Aleksander Morgado wrote: > On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 5:38 PM, Dan Williams > wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2016-07-28 at 00:14 +0200, Aleksander Morgado wrote: > > > > > > The rules were matched only against devices with an exact 'tty' > > >

Re: [PATCH 13/14] zte, udev: avoid making the rules tty-only, and simplify single vendor check

On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 5:38 PM, Dan Williams wrote: > On Thu, 2016-07-28 at 00:14 +0200, Aleksander Morgado wrote: >> The rules were matched only against devices with an exact 'tty' >> subsystem, and >> that means that we were not properly adding additional tags on e.g. >> wwan

Re: [PATCH 13/14] zte, udev: avoid making the rules tty-only, and simplify single vendor check

On Thu, 2016-07-28 at 00:14 +0200, Aleksander Morgado wrote: > The rules were matched only against devices with an exact 'tty' > subsystem, and > that means that we were not properly adding additional tags on e.g. > wwan or > cdc-wdm devices. > Good catch, though perhaps we want to limit the

Re: [PATCH 01/14] udev: remove ENV{DEVTYPE}!="usb_device" rules

On Thu, 2016-07-28 at 10:19 -0500, Dan Williams wrote: > On Thu, 2016-07-28 at 00:13 +0200, Aleksander Morgado wrote: > > > > They're actually a subcase of SUBSYSTEM!="usb", which we apply just > > before. > Actually I thought this was to ensure we match the entire USB device, > not just a