Re: Fwd: Cinterion plugin patch

Hi Reinhard > Can we please get back QMI as an alternative to AT^SWWAN & CDC ECM for the > next PLS8 firmware update FYI we told Gelmalto that, for us, moving away from QMI seemed like a step in the wrong direction. It seems like they want to support building modules with chipsets from other

Re: Fwd: Cinterion plugin patch

On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 08:23:23PM +0100, Aleksander Morgado wrote: > On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 7:03 PM, matthew stanger wrote: > >> Ah, yeah. If the plugin does its own logic to select which CID to use, > >> it should not rely on the parent's connection status check. In our >

Re: Fwd: Cinterion plugin patch

> > Ah, yeah. If the plugin does its own logic to select which CID to use, > it should not rely on the parent's connection status check. In our > case, though, I think we should default back to letting the generic > logic decide the CID to use (i.e. don't fix to use the CIDs 1 and 3). > If we do

Re: Fwd: Cinterion plugin patch

On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 4:27 AM, matthew stanger wrote: > Sorry I sent that last email a little prematurely, was still targeting my > email client and ctrl-entered for another window. You can disregard that > second comment, I see what you did for IP config. Last little