Re: Allow plugins to specify that signal quality/access tech polling isn't needed (v2)

2017-06-05 Thread Dan Williams
On Tue, 2017-05-30 at 20:09 +0200, Aleksander Morgado wrote: > Hey Dan and everyone, > > This patch series contains the following updates w.r.t. the v1 > patches: > >  * When a explicit signal refresh is requested, setup the initial > fast-polling configuration (this was suggested in the review o

Re: [PATCH] Infineon: Add support for Infineon / Intel modems

2017-06-05 Thread Paul Bartell
Hey Aleksander, On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 3:58 AM, Aleksander Morgado wrote: > Hey Paul, > >> >> I spent a little more time debugging the HL7588 today. This modem >> seems to designed for phone-type SIM cards that have a context for MMS >> in the PDP context #1 slot (my combination of SIM card and n

Re: [PATCH] base-bearer: use an initial longer timeout for connectivity check

2017-06-05 Thread Aleksander Morgado
On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 1:57 PM, Colin Helliwell wrote: > >> If we ask too quick for the PDP context status after a successful >> connection attempt reported by the modem, we may find it still flagged >> as inactive if the modem is still busy setting up the PPP session. >> >> Do an explicit longer

Re: [PATCH 2/2] telit: rework QSS unsolicited handler enabling logic

2017-06-05 Thread Aleksander Morgado
On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 1:56 PM, Aleksander Morgado wrote: > On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 9:51 AM, Carlo Lobrano wrote: >> I tested this patch and it looks good to me (I specially like the second >> one). There is just a little mistake I made in my part of the patch. In the >> "status changed" log I inv

Re: [PATCH] base-bearer: use an initial longer timeout for connectivity check

2017-06-05 Thread Colin Helliwell
> On 02 June 2017 at 11:21 Aleksander Morgado wrote: > > If we ask too quick for the PDP context status after a successful > connection attempt reported by the modem, we may find it still flagged > as inactive if the modem is still busy setting up the PPP session. > > Do an explicit longer init

Re: [PATCH 2/2] telit: rework QSS unsolicited handler enabling logic

2017-06-05 Thread Aleksander Morgado
On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 9:51 AM, Carlo Lobrano wrote: > I tested this patch and it looks good to me (I specially like the second > one). There is just a little mistake I made in my part of the patch. In the > "status changed" log I inverted current status with the previous one. > > --- > plugins/t

Re: QSS transitions additional patches

2017-06-05 Thread Carlo Lobrano
On 5 June 2017 at 08:49, Carlo Lobrano wrote: > ​sure, I'll do it today​ ​I replied in the patches' thread​ ___ ModemManager-devel mailing list ModemManager-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/modemmanager-devel

Re: [PATCH 2/2] telit: rework QSS unsolicited handler enabling logic

2017-06-05 Thread Carlo Lobrano
Hi Aleksander, I tested this patch and it looks good to me (I specially like the second one). There is just a little mistake I made in my part of the patch. In the "status changed" log I inverted current status with the previous one. --- plugins/telit/mm-broadband-modem-telit.c | 6 +++--- 1 fil