On 22/05/17 19:08, Aleksander Morgado wrote:
>>> And now that I see this...
>>> * Shouldn't we enable +CIEV only for "signal" (that's the only thing
>>> we end up parsing in the generic +CIEV parser)?
>>> * Shouldn't we move this setting to the generic broadband modem
>>> implementation?
>> All t
On 21/05/17 14:54, Aleksander Morgado wrote:
> This is now managed directly in the generic plugin.
> ---
This has been merged to git master.
> plugins/cinterion/mm-broadband-modem-cinterion.c | 2 +
> plugins/telit/mm-broadband-modem-telit.c | 84
>
> 2 files c
On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 6:09 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
>> And now that I see this...
>> * Shouldn't we enable +CIEV only for "signal" (that's the only thing
>> we end up parsing in the generic +CIEV parser)?
>> * Shouldn't we move this setting to the generic broadband modem
>> implementation?
>
>
On Sun, 2017-05-21 at 15:41 +0200, Aleksander Morgado wrote:
> On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 2:54 PM, Aleksander Morgado
> wrote:
> > +/* Our own enable now */
> > +mm_base_modem_at_command_full (
> > MM_BASE_MODEM (self),
> > mm_base_modem_peek_port_secondary (MM_BASE_MODEM (s
On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 2:54 PM, Aleksander Morgado
wrote:
> +/* Our own enable now */
> +mm_base_modem_at_command_full (
> MM_BASE_MODEM (self),
> mm_base_modem_peek_port_secondary (MM_BASE_MODEM (self)),
> -unsolicited_enable_sequence,
> -NULL, /* respo
This is now managed directly in the generic plugin.
---
plugins/cinterion/mm-broadband-modem-cinterion.c | 2 +
plugins/telit/mm-broadband-modem-telit.c | 84
2 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
diff --git a/plugins/cinterion/mm-broadband-modem-cin
