> Is this previous part really needed? Is there any case in which a LOCK
command would succeed but then UNLOCK command report a "not supported"
error? I guess it doesn't harm to have this, though, your call.
​Right, there is no real need for this, but just for completeness I prefer
to keep it, if
On 10/04/17 12:25, Carlo Lobrano wrote:
> Some modems do not support CSIM lock/unlock, but they do support
> querying SIM unlock retries through +CSIM command.
>
> If CSIM lock returns with "unsupported command" do not propagate
> the error and continue with the other CSIM queries instead, moreove
Some modems do not support CSIM lock/unlock, but they do support
querying SIM unlock retries through +CSIM command.
If CSIM lock returns with "unsupported command" do not propagate
the error and continue with the other CSIM queries instead, moreover the
CSIM lock feature is signed as FEATURE_UNSUP
